kwhilborn:
Thanks for your post. I haven't looked at the links in detail yet, but I'll get to them.
It occurs to me that if you can predict lottery numbers, we can potentially test that power right here. Here's what I suggest:
Suppose I generate 10 sets of lottery numbers, with each set containing 6 numbers in the range 1-45, like a standard lottery. We can pretend that these 10 sets are 10 weekly draws of the lottery. I will use a random method to pick the numbers. That is, I won't choose them myself, but will use a computer to randomly generate them.
Next, for each of those 10 sets of numbers, you will use your psychic powers to predict as many of the numbers in the set as you can. You get to pick 6 numbers for each set.
Then, we compare your predictions to the results.
If you prefer, the results can be generated after you have made your predictions.
And, if you don't trust me to be fair about things, we could appoint a third party to receive the random numbers and/or your predictions by a PM, and then to publish them to the public thread once both sets are in. Then we can all compare and see how well you did.
Do you think you can do better than chance on this? Or is there some problem with this proposal that means your predictive powers won't work in this case?
Thanks for your post. I haven't looked at the links in detail yet, but I'll get to them.
It occurs to me that if you can predict lottery numbers, we can potentially test that power right here. Here's what I suggest:
Suppose I generate 10 sets of lottery numbers, with each set containing 6 numbers in the range 1-45, like a standard lottery. We can pretend that these 10 sets are 10 weekly draws of the lottery. I will use a random method to pick the numbers. That is, I won't choose them myself, but will use a computer to randomly generate them.
Next, for each of those 10 sets of numbers, you will use your psychic powers to predict as many of the numbers in the set as you can. You get to pick 6 numbers for each set.
Then, we compare your predictions to the results.
If you prefer, the results can be generated after you have made your predictions.
And, if you don't trust me to be fair about things, we could appoint a third party to receive the random numbers and/or your predictions by a PM, and then to publish them to the public thread once both sets are in. Then we can all compare and see how well you did.
Do you think you can do better than chance on this? Or is there some problem with this proposal that means your predictive powers won't work in this case?