Everyone here seems to be unfairly judging the Reverends decision or maybe everyone didn't read through the article. His decision was based on what would be best for the child and the school, he never said the child couldn't attend church. Its not about secular conservative ethics its about not placing the child and other children in a situation that's confusing and distracting.
"The mother, a life-long Catholic, thought making the transition in their parish would be the best place for their child to continue friendships, with a support system that included other parents and children.
“The child is welcomed to come, but it would not be acceptable to change the child’s gender and present as a girl,” said Omaha Archdiocese Chancellor, the Rev. Joseph Taphorn.
Taphorn said having the child attend the school for three years as a boy, and then presenting as a girl would not be a good learning environment for the child or other students. He said school has to be a peaceful, positive environment for everyone.
The child will attend a public school in the fall, using her chosen name and wearing a ponytail in her hair."
He's right, can you imagine you went to school with peter and the next year he came back in pony tail wearing a dress and insisting he's jenny. Well I'm sure it would have created more social confusion and at these tender ages its too much to expect children to understand what is going on. Starting fresh at a new school was a good choice. I do think the mother sounds wonderful, incredibly understanding and compassionate, really present for her child. This little girl sounds very lucky and I am sure that at the appropriate age they will start the gender change if that's what she wants.