This isn't an "article?"
List of frustrating things about Pronatalist (and I'm new to this forum):
1. The way he puts that stupid title at the beginning of all his posts as though he is writing an article.
Isn't the real purpose of a "title," both to summarize the focus of the article/post, and to allow a quick skimmer, to find which posts he/she wants to read first or more closely? I know that lots of long and many paragraphs, are hard to read by somebody in a hurry, or in a hurry to see what people are saying on other threads. So I try to make it more approachable and readible, as I would like for people to read and respond to my posts.
Also, some forums, such as this one, do have a "Title" field, and then strangely, the post title doesn't appear in some of the forums. One forum format has an "Outline" link, that displays an outline of the 1st line of all posts. Looks so much better when posts have short "titles."
2. The way he HAS to write three posts at a time.
Since most such posts are different replies to different people, the apparent alternative would be for me to check back on any threads into which I have posted, hourly. That's hardly a "reasonable" request. I have to do it, when I can get around to it, as like most people, I have to live in "the real world" too.
3. The way he uses the straw-man technique so consistently.
4. Lines like this...
"BTW, isn't it a bit strange, that so many population phobics seem to be male?"
You're worse that pharoahmoan for God's sake.
Huh? I didn't understand what you are saying here.
Did you perhaps misspell "pheromones?" If so, whatever are you talking about here?
But quite many of the scensationist population phobic scare-tactic, often largely discredited, authors, tend to be male. I was asking the question, why is that? Could it have anything to do with, that males don't get pregnant? Women who have become pregnant, or someday may become pregnant, may have those "maternal instincts" influencing them, to somewhat defend the natural right for people to become pregnant?