Thanks PH
On titles - for some reason it just annoys me.
On post numbers - I was referring to the number of overall words, rather than the fact you split them up into separate posts. Learn to be more succinct, otherwise few will bother to read your posts.
You've got that from the 'fact' that more authors on the subject tend to be male? That is ridiculous. Would you like to back this up with anything?
I, quite proudly, am female. And, for some strange and unfathomable reason, I quite like the idea of living in a world where there are places with no housing estates, supermarkets or cars.
Based on your logic, shouldn't men want more people in the world too? That way there are more prospective mates and women to impregnate.
On titles - for some reason it just annoys me.
On post numbers - I was referring to the number of overall words, rather than the fact you split them up into separate posts. Learn to be more succinct, otherwise few will bother to read your posts.
But quite many of the scensationist population phobic scare-tactic, often largely discredited, authors, tend to be male. I was asking the question, why is that? Could it have anything to do with, that males don't get pregnant? Women who have become pregnant, or someday may become pregnant, may have those "maternal instincts" influencing them, to somewhat defend the natural right for people to become pregnant?
You've got that from the 'fact' that more authors on the subject tend to be male? That is ridiculous. Would you like to back this up with anything?
I, quite proudly, am female. And, for some strange and unfathomable reason, I quite like the idea of living in a world where there are places with no housing estates, supermarkets or cars.
Based on your logic, shouldn't men want more people in the world too? That way there are more prospective mates and women to impregnate.