Sciencelovah
Registered Senior Member
omg, Enmos, what happened to your avatar? :jawdrop:
Enmos said:I'm serious though, we should be working to decrease the Earths population of humans, not to increase it.
The kittens are well
There is no need to decrease the human population, they manage themselves.
Education are getting expensive, housing as well, not to mention insurance and
health care system. People no longer started to reproduce at 20 or 25. What to
worry? :shrug:
I went to Paris early this month, most houses are built 7 floors, they are looking
just ok. Rigid and stable. People worry about this 2.5% freshwater on earth.
Meanwhile, the 97.5% remain untouchable. Human will find a way to reuse
and recycle everything in sustainable way.
I am glad that the kittens are well.
Night all, I'm off.
There is only so much space on the Earths surface. We will eventually have to eradicate nature completely..
Life is not a term exclusively used to indicate humans
Considering the world population is 6 billion people and dramaticly getting larger.........
How many people can the earth tolerate and for how long?
Also for fun lets assume the world could tolerate 500,000,000 people comfortably and exist in balance with nature......
killing off 90% of the worlds population to secure the future of the human race and the planet earth........
what would you consider the "right" thing to do?
It doesn't matter, when the plant life dwindles, the oxygen levels will come down, the CO[sub]2[/sub] level will go up.. humans will be fucked (pardon the pun).
Yea most people are more or less like you. Be proud.
Humans generally don't smell the reek of our human scent, that our dog pets probably smell in human-teeming cities. So it's okay.
Oddly enough we could have those people appear on earth more slowly over time, and still, they could all have their chance. More right now is not always better.[Yeah, I'm quite proud of how numerous the human race has managed somehow to become, or that God would allow so many people to experience life, but quite ashamed of the much rampant contraceptive pushing. As if people didn't much matter?
Humans growing so populous, shows that at least we are doing something right, and on the right track or something, or at least some of us are on the right track.
Animals giving birth to animals of other species or to humans can mean a change in sucession in the ruling clan in China.Mary had a little lamb;
The doctor was surprised.
Pronatalist said:Actually, "inside" the globe, would provide a whole lot more space, than merely the surface.
Not really. Not at all. If it is inside the globe, it is rather easy to calculate the
limit. Just calculate the volume, and that's the maximum / the limit.
Pronatalist said:But perhaps you were suggesting that outer space might finally become accessable?
Who knows :shrug: We need more people to do more research. Human capacity is unpredictable.
Invention will accelerate another invention.
The earth has no common "spirit," that's too much a New Age term..
imzomnia said:There is no need to decrease the human population, they manage themselves.
Education are getting expensive, housing as well, not to mention insurance and
health care system. People no longer started to reproduce at 20 or 25. What to
worry?
I went to Paris early this month, most houses are built 7 floors, they are looking
just ok. Rigid and stable. People worry about this 2.5% freshwater on earth.
Meanwhile, the 97.5% remain untouchable. Human will find a way to reuse
and recycle everything in sustainable way.
I am glad that the kittens are well.
There is only so much space on the Earths surface. We will eventually have to eradicate nature completely..
You are just a fucking troll aren't you ? Nobody can say this moronic stuff and be serious about it.Baby booms, much like a swelling pregnant woman's belly, don't like unnatural arbitrary confinement. Let them naturally "bulge" proudly.
If that's where we are heading, hadn't we prudently pursue the relaxed orderly transition? Let the natural waves of naturally burgeoning human population expansion overspread the planet naturally, baby booms "blossoming" and "bursting forth" naturally, welcome everybody to have their place, let people move back to the countryside that they previously depopulated but now at urban densities as there gets to be so many of us, build bigger cities closer together, build population arcologies, whatever is needed.
So many parents say look around, there's places for more people everywhere. Really? Let them fill the gaps in between the people with still more people. They are correct. It's quite possible to somehow fit more people upon the planet, in such a way. They say or imply they don't mind populating denser. I insist upon allowing humans to explore how to populate denser, always much better than contemplating Nazi-like, anti-child eugenics. The natural flow of human life unhindered, is beautiful as it welcomes all the more fellow human beings to experience life.
Pronatalist said:The earth has no common "spirit," that's too much a New Age term..
Nature...Its what we rely on to survive,its whose mercy we are at to live.
Resouces-'Shelter'
At the moment in (not so)Great Britain there is a housing crisis, there are hundreds of thousand's of people crammed into shared housing between 5-9 people sharing 4 bedroom houses......problem..!
The housing market has outpriced itself and is on a decline,as the country is in recession people cannot afford and cannot get mortgages..result hundreds of thousands of empty properties up and down the country, the price of rental is so extortionate that people renting will never be able to save enough money to actualy buy a property..
people are starting to realise that the majority of their children, this generation will never be able to buy their own house.
One of the ways round this which has become a trend recently among teenage girls is to get pregnant and get a council house/flat (as they get priority)...The problem is in less than 16 years their children will be in the same predicament but their will be no more council flats/houses as this generation has had to use them to have a roof over their head that they can call home...
normaly council property was used to get a foot on the housing ladder as it was really cheap so you could afford to save for a deposit for mortgage on your own property-so the houses would have been used on a generation cycle, but that cycle has stopped....you cannot build your own house without permission,you cannot live in a tent, you cannot live in communal homeless groups this is one problem with over population.....
I'm wondering where in Britain the first shanty towns will be, I reckon London or Manchester.As this would also not be allowed I wonder what the government would do if there were a couple of hundred thousand people made homeless (NOTHING)..
So childbearing may help these women now but it effects everybody longterm....No property,No job,No finances,No education should equate to no children unfortunately it is not the lack of education that is causing all these teenage pregancies for housing it is the only way they can have their own property.....