Zionist piracy

Status
Not open for further replies.
...I don't know for sure, but believe a blockade is an act of war.

By edit: I just checked at wiki where they quote another source as follows:
“A blockade is defined by the Encyclopedia Britannica as an "an act of war by which a belligerent prevents access to or departure from a defined part of the enemy’s coasts."[4]…”
From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockade#Act_of_war

Since Hamas itself is existentially an act of war on Israel, it only seems fair.
 
I think that correct as I saw in brief video one swing what did look like a piece of pipe at one of the Israeli commandos coming down a rope to board the ship, but clearly that was an improvised last minute effort at defense. Anyway it is certainly OK to try to prevent pirates from boarding your ship on the high seas, even with fire arms, but they obviously did not have any as were forced to improvise a feeble defense.

Perhaps the guy with the marble shooting sling shot got off a few marbles too?
Before the commandos broke his "weapon." (CNN Video showed it broken, laying on the deck.)

BTW it is fun to try to shoot flying sea gulls with slingshot. I did it every lunchtime when working for CGS Labs in Stanford Connecticut. (A summer job while I was an undergraduate. I never hit a bird. - They see marble coming and dodge it - I think it was fun for us both.)

out of 700 or so people and a sudden attack against them someone's fight or flight instinct is going to say fight. no maybe if the Israelis didn't go in in a state of full on assualt mode they wouldn't have gotten a response like that. with what I have seen and read it seemed the Israeli attack was dewsigned to trigger a fight response from people so they would have an excuse to shoot.
 
ahah, as I expected.

The "peaceful protestors" were provocateurs and the innocent civilians were armed and attacking. So, as I had stated came true...and the premonitions of mass Israeli condemnation by Bells,SAM and company are finally shown to be the nonsense they are.
 
Since Hamas itself is existentially an act of war on Israel, it only seems fair.
No, not fair. In fact collective punishment is a war crime. Same as dropping white phosphorus over a city is. etc.

As Israeli repeatedly violates international law they could have used poison gas with less bad PR if they claimed one of their ships carrying it had to be abandoned as it was leaking and drifted into the flotilla where it exploded. The "Israel can do no wrong" posters would support that line too.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not one mention of Hamas in all your defense of the Gaza activists, unbelievable. How do you guys think Hamas is able to maintain it's power?
good politics promising and giving the votors what they want.
Because it provides humanitarian services for the citizens who in turn support the terrorist regime! The blockade is a just form of defense against the terrorist threat.
no it isn't. maybe if it was just weapons but food, building materials nope.

I of course do not know the exact circumstances of these reported deaths,
when has that ever stopped you before from mindlessly defending Israel.
but I do know Palestinians generally haven't a clue what non-violent protest means.
as usual for a pro ISrael person what you know is bullshit. they have been forced to violence do to the suppression of their nonviolent protest which routinely get violently attacked by the thugs you defend.

Edit: Video clearly shows the IDF soldiers being attacked.
No it shows them being defended against.
Israel just wanted to stop these ships,
So it used the most violent and mostlikely to get people killed method. Bullshit. they wanted to harm and punish these people for having the audacity to stand up to them/
the deaths were therefore the fault of the violent (we cannot call them peace activists anymore) protesters.
they were peace activists but than again they wanted to help palestinians so I guess to your fucking bigotry that means they deserved to die like the palestinians who want to be left alone in their own lands.
 
They didn't fire on the flotilla, I haven't read a single report which says they "Fired" on them. If they did...there would be 600 dead people, not (an oddly worded) maximum of 16. An air drop-in of Israeli military boarded the ships, 600 passionate individuals had amongst them a few which resorted to violence and so they were apparently shot in the altercation.
An indisputably illegal hijacking of a ship in international waters for whatever reason that leads to conflict and casualties is criminal, period.
A few questions:
1. How did they find 600 people stupid enough to get on boats, and who convinced them they would actually help the situation?

2. What did people expect, Israel would just capitulate to media pressure?

3. The first 3 ships which successfully entered Gaza didn't have a media presence, the last 3 did. If these people really care about helping people with aid why didn't they eliminate media presence?
That you can attempt to defend clear criminal action is regrettable.
As to your points.
1.) If the Palestinian people were not oppressed, starved and imprisoned, there would not be humanitarian interventions. As it is, this is a noble example of human empathy and should be (by any decent human being) supported and admired.
2.) People should expect at a minimum that Israel should not violate international law. This action is indisputably criminal and frankly disgusting. Period. And speaks volumes around the unpredictable nature of the regime in Israel.
3.) The Media presence is aimed at raising awareness of the gravity around the Palestinian plight. An issue that is generally ignored by the Western corporate media. Note that this incident is so outrageous that it is being universally condemned, even buy the WCM.

This is another nail in the coffin for the Israeli State. :m:
 

"It should be emphasized that both the State of Israel and the IDF made repeated calls to the flotilla, telling them that all goods and humanitarian aid could be transferred according to the secure and approved methods in place today, as is done on a near daily basis," the Israel Defense Forces said in a written statement. {CNN}​

and like any rational person we know if they did that not an ounce would get into gaza. fuck it would probably be used to build illegal settlements
 
An indisputably illegal hijacking of a ship in international waters for whatever reason that leads to conflict and casualties is criminal, period.

That you can attempt to defend clear criminal action is regrettable.
As to your points.
1.) If the Palestinian people were not oppressed, starved and imprisoned, there would not be humanitarian interventions. As it is, this is a noble example of human empathy and should be (by any decent human being) supported and admired.
2.) People should expect at a minimum that Israel should not violate international law. This action is indisputably criminal and frankly disgusting. Period. And speaks volumes around the unpredictable nature of the regime in Israel.
3.) The Media presence is aimed at raising awareness of the gravity around the Palestinian plight. An issue that is generally ignored by the Western corporate media. Note that this incident is so outrageous that it is being universally condemned, even buy the WCM.

This is another nail in the coffin for the Israeli State. :m:

haha, it might have been if there wasn't so much footage of "peaceful protesters" assaulting Israeli boarding parties.
It's sooooo "illegal" to board a ship in "International Waters", if you have a 6th grade education.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKOmLP4yHb4
 
ahah, as I expected.

The "peaceful protestors" were provocateurs and the innocent civilians were armed and attacking. So, as I had stated came true...and the premonitions of mass Israeli condemnation by Bells,SAM and company are finally shown to be the nonsense they are.
So they provoked a vicious attack designed to trigger a conflict. your full of shit. the Israeli attack was designed to cause a fight response. but of course right better every non jew die than one jew.
 
Nothing is an accident or a result of a sudden reaction in this incident: This journey was first declared to public more than six weeks ago. During this period, both sides increased the tension among its supporters; both had been very decisive for not listening to one another: Turkey was continuously sending messages which can be summarized as "we don't care about your embargo, we will come there and you can do nothing about it". And Israel was also replying with same blind decisiveness, yet a more precise message: "we will not allow this show and we will stop these ships at all cost".

Among all these reciprocal policy of stubbornness and built-up hatred, people's lives were the last thing on the agenda. To be more precise, the possibility of "martyrdom" and plans for marketing this was a juicy political gain for Turkey; and Israel had a long time to prepare its own "welcome" committee. Things have developed as it was planned and expected by both sides as everybody is shading crocodile tears now.
 
So they provoked a vicious attack designed to trigger a conflict. your full of shit. the Israeli attack was designed to cause a fight response. but of course right better every non jew die than one jew.

You're just sad that the party you support is so savagely uneducated, where as the party I support (the Israelis) are intelligibly sharp minded.
 
You're just sad that the party you support is so savagely uneducated, where as the party I support (the Israelis) are intelligibly sharp minded.
Israelis intelligently smart minded? are you stupid. they act like stupid spoiled children. they played right into the protestors hands in showing them selves to be the violent thugs looking for conflict the are. The party I support is brilliant in constantly using the Israeli violent tendencies and arrogance against them. But than again you clearly eat up all that Israeli propaganda.
 
haha, it might have been if there wasn't so much footage of "peaceful protesters" assaulting Israeli boarding parties.
It's sooooo "illegal" to board a ship in "International Waters", if you have a 6th grade education.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKOmLP4yHb4
However you want to paint it, seizing a ship by force in international waters is a criminal action defined as piracy. Your continued lack of empathy for needless loss of life at the hands of the IDF is noted. :m:
 
seizing a ship by force in international waters is a criminal action defined as piracy.

Correction for "international waters":

500px-Internationalwaters.png


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_waters

Blue parts are International waters, or more technically speaking "High Seas". No part of Mediterranean can be considered as "international waters". Plus this incident happened within the limits of Israel's "Exclusive Economic Zone" (200 nautical miles).

Correction for "piracy":

Piracy is a war-like act committed by private parties (not affiliated with any government) that engage in acts of robbery and/or criminal violence at sea.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piracy

So government actions can not be defined as piracy.
 
So they provoked a vicious attack designed to trigger a conflict. your full of shit. the Israeli attack was designed to cause a fight response. but of course right better every non jew die than one jew.

Yah, you know what thats right.

If we essentially boil it down into who's life is more important any sane person would pick the Israeli.

Why you ask?

Because if you pick one Israeli he may be the person to cure cancer or to make a breakthrough in science and technology. If you pick any random Gazan they are liable to blow themselves up for a few dozen virgins.

If you want to boil it down into who's life is more valuable hoping in vain that you can terrify people into a moral dilemma it will not work.

There are 13 million Jews worldwide.

You tried to boil it down into which person is worth more. Now we cannot account for worldwide what type of person to compare because there are all types of abject poverty. So we are going to do this populationwise via the laws of supply and demand.

6.8 billion humans inhabit this world. The current Jewish population is around 13 million worldwide.

That means for every Jewish person there are 523.0769 other people (and I guess that ".0769" is maybe a pinky or something).

So yah, populationwise as far as endangerment goes the life of a Jewish person is essentially more valuable than that of some random Gazan whose death would probably involve 20 kilos of C4 srapped to his own chest with love from Gaza.

The sick and twisted logic that you seem to have hammered into your skull is that Jewish people like to pick off poor little Gazan children and their moms for the fun of it.

Have you ever asked yourself once why exactly they got into that situation?

Do you think if rather than try to invade Israel on it's independance they had brought their diplomats to start relations and to congragulate Israel that they would be in such a sh***y situation?

you provoked the bull now your getting the horns. You dont get the right to cry and whine like a child because you started it. We are ending it.
 
Correction for "international waters":

500px-Internationalwaters.png


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_waters

Blue parts are International waters, or more technically speaking "High Seas". No part of Mediterranean can be considered as "international waters". Plus this incident happened within the limits of Israel's "Exclusive Economic Zone" (200 nautical miles).

Correction for "piracy":



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piracy

So government actions can not be defined as piracy.

Semantics. If you are defending what the EU, the UN and the International community is condemning as indisputably criminal, you are no doubt a formidable legal mind. :m:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top