Tony Szamboti
Registered Senior Member
You don't have to raise the temperature of a ton of steel, all you need to do is raise the Temperature of a section of of that steel to 1130 F and you compromise the structural strength of that beam.
The other thing is that many of the support beams were of thin steel bent bar truss construction instead of solid steel beams.
Here is a good read on the construction techniques of the WTC in comparison to the Empire State Building.
Concrete removal
I have previously read Vincent Dunn's opinion on why the towers collapsed, and I read it again here.
I fully understand the floor trusses were not heavy thick columns or beams, but we have no physical evidence of them experiencing extremely high temperatures either. In order to get a collapse initiation on their computer model NIST had to cause the floor trusses to sag by over 40 inches. However, in the actual testing they did, at Underwriter's Laboratoiries per ASTM E119, the trusses only sagged by 3 inches, with full heat and physical loads.
Many try to say the testing was done on 35 foot trusses and the trusses that failed would have been the 60 footers. That is true, but 3 inches on 35 footers doesn't scale up to 40 plus inches on 60 footers.
There have been huge fires in buildings constructed in the manner the twin towers were, including the North Tower in 1975, and there was not even a hint of a possible collapse. Why weren't the floor trusses affected then? The SFRM being knocked off by the aircraft is not very plausible as the collapses initiated above where the major impacts occurred.
Additionally, the perimeter columns were so strong that just nine columns on each corner of each side, or 72 perimeter columns, could support the entire weight of the building above them, core included. So if a perimeter column buckled due to a floor truss pulling on it through catenary action, why would the nearby columns buckle? They had a huge amount of redundancy. This is proven by the aircraft impact holes. The still intact perimeter columns on that face did not all of a sudden wilt due to those nearby being cut. It is highly unlikely that the rapid collapse initiations occurred due to a few sagging floor trusses and a couple of buckled perimeter columns. On top of that the floor trusses would not have been able to drag down core columns as the core beam connections were stronger than the floor truss connections.
A much more plausible explanation is that the outer core columns were cut and the perimeter columns were bowed inwardly and buckled through their connection to the core columns via the floor trusses.
I am extremely suspicious that NONE of the steel from WTC 7 was saved for NIST to analyze and less than 0.5% of that from the towers. Real investigations are not done this way. If NIST had that steel there would be no question as to why the towers and WTC 7 collapsed.
Please forgive my removal of the URL you posted, as the forum won't allow any URLs, even in quotes of posts being replied to, until the poster has 20 posts. This is only my 7th post here.
Last edited: