Well he knew what the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics was, you see, but didn't really grasp how it doesn't work for his point.
the 2nd is a rule that incorporates a direction to d/t to the physics of the 'standard model'
hence when you hear the idea of 'well that can't happen, it goes against the law of physics, be certain the 2LoT is the primary one underlying the claim.
IN 1901 planck maintained the second in his calculations in which that direction was imposed to the base unit of energy
To understand this absolute fact and how angular momentum removed the ability to combine like 'f' of energy within like systems, removed the ability to calculate the total power of the 2 systems.
ie..... if 2 men can each lift a maximum individually; the total weight the 2 can lift together is often greater than the sum of the 2 individual maximums.
(the current math cannot account for the increase or total potential of the combining systems) (that is why they created dark matter/energy to correct the errors between what hubble observed and what the current math predicted)
what has happened on this forum is that people are contesting what i say because they personally do not know the actual publications, math and evidence nor have any intent of looking into it before commenting.
the same MO i have deal with since 16 yrs old when writing on the enchange of energy between neurons (it's light, not electrons)
to really dig deep enough to comprehend what is being said why not just look at plancks pub and see for yourslf before commenting?
when a single person on this site can show me where i am lying, bsing or have not clue what i am saying; then i will leave!
but be fair, because for every item a person posts, they must present evidence that can withstand
as welll must observe evidence and answer the questions in rebuttal
what a few of you fail is to understand YOU ARE A PEER TOO........ So that common sense must apply to you rather than just what the book told you (science is no theologically based; the law (2nd) is not the last word, either)
but from the gays to the mods to the mathematicians, physicist and even the from the pig headed deceivers; for some funny reason, they can't over come the truth of matters:
why, because i have dealt with this shit for too long (since 83), have reviewed and observed more material then most even know exists and to this day, will be looking into more.
ps... i have an error to claim: the paper Photo Neuron Conduction (PNC Theory) was not written in 82, it was 83................... (damn i love being human)