Now, let's get intellectual!
The most important conclusion I came to regarding the meaning of life is that:
We must make our own meaning in life
I expect that you will spend some time skimming the ideas of numerous philosophers to address this question. I did the same. Essentially, I found that all chose some set of axioms, and constructed their own meaning from there.
My current axioms (I change them sometimes, but not lightly) are something like (I don't usually formalize them):
These are effectively baseless rules - I choose to accept them at face value, without looking for underlying reasons. There probably are underlying reasons (that's why they're on the list), but I deliberately choose not to examine those reasons in order to keep my life reasonably simple so that I can function on a day-to-day basis.
I probably have other value-based axioms as well... I don't think this is a definitive list.
Here are some personal observations, conclusions, and life rules which are relevant, and have been developed from those axioms in some way:
So I choose not to be concerned whether or not Hitler was punished in proportion to his crimes, because perfect justice is not attainable, and Hitler can't do any more harm to me, to other people, to Society, or to Humanity.
I choose to aspire, because that is more likely to increase my happiness, the happiness of others, and the wellbeing of Society and Humanity.
The apparent fact that at some time in the future all will be dust does concern me sometimes when I sink into depression... but I attempt to resolve this issue by considering the sum of goals over time. The total "goodness" in the Universe at ay particular time isn't particularly important, but the sum of "goodness" over the Universe's entire history is.
Even though all will become dust, it is still better at that time for there to have been some past goodness than otherwise.
But... assuming the existence of God, Heaven, and Hell - what is Hell, exactly? What causes one to enter Hell? What causes one to enter Heaven?
You may be interested in the works of Christian theologians, both Catholic and Protestant. Peter Kreeft is an excellent source of intellectual apologetics for Christianity in general and Catholicism in particular. His article on Faith has been a comfort to me in the face of the question of Hell.
Essentially, I believe that if God exists, He will not punish me for intellectual honesty, that if I remain open to Salvation through Christ, that if on death I discover the reality of God and choose at that instant to embrace it with my whole Heart, Mind, and Soul, that I will be Saved, regardless of honest intellectual doubts during my life.
Call it a loophole if you will, but it's not unsupported by Christian theology.
Exactly the questions I struggled with and still examine regularly.§outh§tar said:What meaning do you have in life? I formerly believed myself to be pleasing God and furthering His kingdom (all part of the Christian jargon) and that I would one day be rewarded for all eternity.
I find that there really is no reason for me to live either a moral or immoral life but my Christian upbringing has pretty much ensured that I will never become a drunkard or be smoking port or banging pretty girls after ten... What reasons do you give for living moral lives?
What solace and comfort do you have for life and what joy do you have in death?
What then do you devote your lives to if not for a "higher purpose and calling"?
The most important conclusion I came to regarding the meaning of life is that:
We must make our own meaning in life
I expect that you will spend some time skimming the ideas of numerous philosophers to address this question. I did the same. Essentially, I found that all chose some set of axioms, and constructed their own meaning from there.
My current axioms (I change them sometimes, but not lightly) are something like (I don't usually formalize them):
- Life is better than death; for myself first, but also for others
- Happiness is better than unhappiness; for myself first, but also for others
- The wellbeing of Society and/or Humanity is better than otherwise
- Justice is worthwhile only as guided by the preceding axioms
- I have free will
I also have some scientific axioms as a basis for evaluating evidence: - My senses provide a reasonable approximation of reality
- The principle of induction is valid
- Past goodness and future goodness are equally worthwhile
- The past can not be changed
- The future is not fixed
These are effectively baseless rules - I choose to accept them at face value, without looking for underlying reasons. There probably are underlying reasons (that's why they're on the list), but I deliberately choose not to examine those reasons in order to keep my life reasonably simple so that I can function on a day-to-day basis.
I probably have other value-based axioms as well... I don't think this is a definitive list.
Here are some personal observations, conclusions, and life rules which are relevant, and have been developed from those axioms in some way:
- My own happiness is increased by the happiness of those around me
- Society and Humanity are worthwhile entities in their own right
- Vengeance is petty. Worrying about the rewards and punishments of others decreases my happiness (but bear axiom 3 in mind )
- A good deed really can be its own reward
- Intellectual honesty makes me happy
- Perfect justice is not attainable
So I choose not to be concerned whether or not Hitler was punished in proportion to his crimes, because perfect justice is not attainable, and Hitler can't do any more harm to me, to other people, to Society, or to Humanity.
I choose to aspire, because that is more likely to increase my happiness, the happiness of others, and the wellbeing of Society and Humanity.
The apparent fact that at some time in the future all will be dust does concern me sometimes when I sink into depression... but I attempt to resolve this issue by considering the sum of goals over time. The total "goodness" in the Universe at ay particular time isn't particularly important, but the sum of "goodness" over the Universe's entire history is.
Even though all will become dust, it is still better at that time for there to have been some past goodness than otherwise.
The thought of eternal damnation is surely a concern to all rational people.There is also my dilemma of what if I'm wrong, and there really is a hell. I surely don't want to spend eternity there and this frightens me enough that I am borderline and keep hoping there will be some divine revelation that reassures me and gives me some sort of hope.
...
Does it not bother you that you just might be wrong concerning God and that you might actually end up in hell for eternity? The very possibility that they might be right when they say there is a hell, despite the lack of evidence is something that bothers me..
But... assuming the existence of God, Heaven, and Hell - what is Hell, exactly? What causes one to enter Hell? What causes one to enter Heaven?
You may be interested in the works of Christian theologians, both Catholic and Protestant. Peter Kreeft is an excellent source of intellectual apologetics for Christianity in general and Catholicism in particular. His article on Faith has been a comfort to me in the face of the question of Hell.
Essentially, I believe that if God exists, He will not punish me for intellectual honesty, that if I remain open to Salvation through Christ, that if on death I discover the reality of God and choose at that instant to embrace it with my whole Heart, Mind, and Soul, that I will be Saved, regardless of honest intellectual doubts during my life.
Call it a loophole if you will, but it's not unsupported by Christian theology.
Last edited: