cool skill
forget this case for a minute because it IS so public and look at any other case not involving a celeb
say a 12 year old girl is brutally raped and then murdered, the media would be up in arms about it and would gladly say who was charged with the crime, i seriously doubt that in 6months-year ect when the jury comes back not guilty because he wasnt there or whatever that the same media spotlight would be on that case. So that person has been tared that they are a criminal yet they have comited no crime. Tell me that if they then aplied for a job as a kindergarten teacher they wouldnt be discriminated against? some parent would rember or the person incharge or the kinder or whatever and there would be NO chance of them getting that job. Now thats just about a job, not to mention the potentual for discrimination about where they live, where they hang out ect ect
tell me this never happens
if someone is found to have comited the crime then by all means if you want releace there name but its not unjust to protect an inocent person from discrimination
as for your system being courpt dont critisise a verdict then campaine for it to be changed so you DO have faith in it, however those changes should be made (ie abolishing state courts and just having a fed system, geting rid of jurys, puting a media block on releacing info on crimes before they go to court so potentual jurys arnt tainted) whatever you need to do
and as for having an opinion, from what i have herd about this it seems to come from the media and the lack of faith you seem to have in your justice system. You hardly ever here people here who dissagree with how a trial went (except for people involved i guess). Mostly the media and people say "he\she were found guilty\inocent and the party is planing to apeal\or not"
Oh BTW what was the big anouncment that they were going to make? i herd they were going to make one and then nothing else and it has me intreged as to what it could be