And here we go with the typical personal attacks:
These are not personal attacks. These are dismantling of the faulty logic
that you present here.
You cannot dismiss God as an explanation for unexplained events simply because you don't believe in him.
If that were an acceptable defense, this whole thread would be about two posts long.
MR: "Here's some ghosts."
Everybody else "We don't believe in ghosts, therefore it can't be ghosts."
We've asked a valid question:
How do you distinguish acts of a ghost from acts of God?
Your response about "not believing in" God contradicts your own assertions about ghosts, and invalidates any and all objections you've had about skeptics' explanations.
As I've said already, this isn't the place for a theological discussion.
Nice try. If someone suggested it was remotely operated by a cell phone and a servo-motor, would you cry foul, and suggest that be taken up in the technology forum? No.
You presented this video,
here. We get to analyze it without needing your approval or foregone conclusions.
And you need to defend your assertion
why it's ghosts. There are a dozen equally valid explanations for the events in the video - one of which - by your own logic - is God. Show how it's not.