As an aside, I find it fascinating to what lengths MR will go to build such straw men. I am pretty sure that no one in this thread has used any of the above words, including - and especially - "liar", except MR.
One has to wonder - if he didn't have to put word in his opponent's mouths - would he have any rebuttal
at all.
BTW, in addition to being a straw man, these responses commit the informal
fallacy of misleading vividness AKA purple prose.
embellishing with vivid detail ("deviously, selfishly, conniving, greedy") to add a facade of gravity.
Interestingly, Misleading vividness is related to
anecdotal evidence, upon which, MR relies heavily.
Wiki has a rather apropos example:
Anecdotal evidence is often unscientific or
pseudoscientific because
various forms of cognitive bias may affect the collection or presentation of evidence. For instance, someone who claims to have had an encounter with a supernatural being or alien may present a very vivid story, but this is not falsifiable.