Sapientivore
Registered Senior Member
People are more dangerous to themselves than each other, imho.
Not in my own life, but your mileage may vary.People are more dangerous to themselves than each other, imho.
This is true. People tend to stress themselves out over possibilities they have no influence on whatsoever.Fair enough. I've just seen way more misery from people stressing over the possibility of others harming them, than from actual harm.
I could reduce my chances of robbery and stranger rape to almost zero if I carried an AK-47, a riot shotgun and a sixpack of grenades with me everywhere.
My back would be sore more often, but still totally worth it.
:thumbsup:
What does it tell us that female soldiers deployed overseas stop drinking water after 7 p.m. to reduce the odds of being raped if they have to use the bathroom at night? Or that a soldier who was assaulted when she went out for a cigarette was afraid to report it for fear she would be demoted — for having gone out without her weapon? Or that, as Representative Jane Harman puts it, "a female soldier in Iraq is more likely to be raped by a fellow soldier than killed by enemy fire."
Read more: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1968110,00.html#ixzz1fCTILijb
Female Soldiers Died of Dehydration Rather Than Risk Sexual Assault
Read more: http://digitaljournal.com/article/145378#ixzz1fCTYvT4x
A classic example of irrational risk analysis. Road accidents are among the top five causes of death everywhere in the world, and they cause far more injuries than deaths. Even in places like Africa where most people can't afford a car, and even in places like Iraq where people are shooting at each other.People are dangerous.
Well, yes, of course.When you say "everywhere" does this include the loo?
Jessica Rich, a 24-year-old former Army reservist who one night early last month climbed drunk into her Volkswagen Jetta and drove south on a northbound interstate outside of Denver. She slammed head-on into a sport-utility vehicle, killing herself and slightly injuring four others. After a nine-month tour of Iraq in 2003 - and according to former soldiers who'd been in group therapy with her, having been raped during her service - PTSD was diagnosed.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/18/magazine/18cover.html?pagewanted=allWhat Swift said distressed her most, however, was a situation that involved her squad leader, the sergeant to whom she directly reported in Iraq. She claimed that he propositioned her for sex the first day the two of them arrived in Iraq and that she felt coerced into having a sexual relationship with him that lasted four months - the relationship consisting, she said, of his knocking on her door late at night and demanding intercourse. When she finally ended this arrangement, Swift told me, the sergeant retaliated by ordering her to do solitary forced marches from one side of the camp to another at night in full battle gear and by humiliating her in front of her fellow soldiers.
People are more dangerous to themselves than each other, imho.
Look at how you posed the question and ask yourself why I raised my eyebrows when you first wanted to debate this as you posed the question (refer to post 222). Others also queried you, to which you pretty much told them how wrong they were.@ Bells..
For closure purposes.
------------------------
Errr... No.
I can not complete the task of proving the affirmitive.
You win, Bells.
Thanks
Good bye all...
These are people who have been brainwashed (they euphemistically call it "basic training") into believing that violence is a perfectly normal way to deal with other human beings. So you're surprised that when one of them wants sex he just goes out and assaults someone to get it? Duh?Had no idea how common sexual assault was in the military...read stories of individuals though.
When you're in the military your CO has complete power over you. It's not like a real job, where if you get tired of the abuse you can give him the finger and walk out. Sure, if there are enough of you you might manage to arouse some interest from the press or even the legal system, but by then you've all been raped about six times.It's especially nasty if it's the CO forcing sex on you.
* sigh * There is so much truth in that. As much as I cheered when the draft ended, even I have to admit that an all-volunteer army has a major down-side. When most of the people in the army were regular folks like you and me, they acted as a buffer against the real hard-core guys. Now that they're all real hard-core guys (and gals) there's no brake on their hard-core behavior.So I guess one way to reduce the chances of getting raped: don't join the military.
People have always taken risks with their health and life. We're all happy to risk something bad happening in the future in order to have some enjoyment today. The difference is that in those days a far greater percentage of the population died at the hands of other humans than die that way today. In the cities of medieval Europe, the murder rate was something like a hundred times greater than it is today in, say, Washington DC, one of the most deadly cities in America.Overall - agreed. The number of people who kill themselves because of overeating, smoking, drinking, doing stupid things (i.e. shooting themselves, driving drunk etc) outnumbers the number of people killed by other people by several orders of magnitude.
Who was that masked stranger anyway?Goodbye Randwolf. I won't say it has been fun, because well, it really hasn't been.
People aren't really killing themselves in greater numbers. It just looks that way because fewer of us are murdered so we survive to die from the effects of our own dissolute lifestyles.
Who said PTSD's rational?Yet you're worried about being killed or injured by one of your fellow citizens, the probability of which is so low that it is entirely rational to ignore it.
People can be a victim of their own fear, as well.
So I guess one way to reduce the chances of getting raped: don't join the military.
Right - now apply to this to every place and situation where rape is likely.