Anything done, written or suggested by an Indian is not something that I would ever be interested in. And that goes especially true for a Muslim Indian!
Baron Max
Why is being nude so "wrong"?
- Thread starter Thoreau
- Start date
Anything done, written or suggested by an Indian is not something that I would ever be interested in. And that goes especially true for a Muslim Indian!
Baron Max
your loss :shrug:
No, Sam, it's not my loss, it's your loss. You should study India a little more carefully, then you'd see the dire conditions that exist in India ...starvation, diseases, lack of fresh water, lack of sanitary sewers, the horrendous pollution problems, the lack of education, the government corruption, ...... and on and on.
But no, see, you don't see those things becuase you're rich enough to ignore it all. Then to make it seem as if India is a nice place, you only show people the good parts (if there are any!), while attacking the USA for the few things that are wrong in our nation. Shame, shame, Sam. That's the worst kind of hypocrisy there is ...and you show it daily here at sciforums.
Baron Max
Unfortunately the few things that are wrong with the US (at the moment, these few things include Iraq and Afghanistan, maybe Iran Pakistan) seem much more significant to the prospect of future nuclear annihilation of the planet.
YES I would have a problem with it. Too many raging hormones at that age.
In General I think it's pretty weird!!
I mean what extremes are we even talking here? Like the whole family sitting around naked watching a movie?
So you're gonna wait and do nothing to stop the horrors that are occuring in India? ...just let the little kids starve to death while you sit waiting and doing nothing?
Hmm, good plan, Sam, and it seems that India is doing the same waiting game with their own people at stake. Yeah, good plan, Sam, good plan.
Baron Max
Yeah, evidently some people here think that nudity in the home is no big deal. Can you imagine that?? ....LOL!
Remember, tho', Shorty, this is just like many issues here at sciforums .....where people put forth idealisms without regard to the realities of humans and life. Sounds good on paper, so it must be good in real life! ...LOL!
Baron Max
Yeah I shutter to think about SAM and her family walking around together naked :runaway:
As jsut about everyone - normal person - discovers when they first go to a genuine, public, daytime, stranger-populated nude beachshorty said:
nudity isn't sexual, in itself. The same people look sexy clothed as naked - not always vice versa.
Guys are always afraid of getting erections - they don't.
But if it bothers folks to have the possibility, you could always make the playboy bunnies wear clothes, and let the rest of us not. Because if there's something that makes less sense than a "bathing suit", I can't think of what it would be.
Last edited:
No, it's not strange ....you practically admitted it in one of your posts above. You also posted pictures of naked people in India as if it was perfectly natural. It's easy to make that connection to you and your family. And in fact, it's easy to make that connection to all Indian families!
Baron Max
Because YOU brought it up in conversation, Sam!! YOU started talking about your family, your home nation of India, YOUR easy acceptance of nudity.
Because YOU brought the topic up.
Baron Max
But but why would you be imagining it?
Because YOU brought it up in conversation, Sam!! YOU started talking about your family, your home nation of India, YOUR easy acceptance of nudity.
Because YOU brought the topic up.
Baron Max
She seems to be having problems reading eh Baron:shrug:
Yes Baron said exactly what I would have said!!
YOU, SAM mentioned throughout this whole thread about how it was common for your FAMILY to walk around naked in your house, or shack, or hut.... In a recent post in regards to Baron asking about teenagers, (brothers and sisters) YOU then reminded us again about your strange upbringing.
Maybe if you stopped mentioning it, we wouldn't have it in our minds.
wow, how did I miss this?!
I wouldn't but that doesn't mean they wouldn't. My son (16) sometimes tells his sister (9) to get clothes on. Rule is, she has to. If she doesn't want to, then she has to keep her nudity in her bedroom. If there is anyone over who is not an immediate family member, then nudity is not allowed.
We don't want to make anyone uncomfortable, which is why we keep it in our house.
And it makes me wonder what kind of families some of you have where only a piece of clothing is what keeps incest from happening.
And would you leave them alone in the house ....with her running around naked?
Obviously you don't know much about human sexual hormones and they're powerful force on the human body.
Baron Max
holy crap! Seriously!? I've run around my brothers in a bikini, don't even tell me they thought of having sex with me!! I saw them in their underwear A LOT and it never crossed my mind. Is this common??
and I said I wouldn't have a problem with it, but that doesn't mean they wouldn't.
Bikini or underwear is still clothing. Do you think teenagers, brothers and sisters should be running around naked together? What would you think if you and your husband came home to find your 16 yr old son and 9 yr old daughter "BOTH" running around naked......or playfighting?
Or what if your son is 16 but your daughter was lets say 14 0r 15 and more developed?