John J. Bannan
Registered Senior Member
Because Muslims and Jews are good people.
There are plenty of moral decisions where the context and details are completely foreign to ancient religions. No written moral code can forsee every interation of human interaction. No moral code can predict every permutation of technology. Not all Christians, for instance, are in agreement about the Terry Schiavo case. Not all Christians are against abortion.
Of course that's an argument. It's o.k. to indoctrinate children with a belief system, if it's good for them. There you have it. I don't have to try again. That's good enough.
You would of course then have to show that these children are only good because of the religious beliefs that they have been indoctrinated in. Of course we both know doing so is an excercise in idiocy because a person being 'good' does not stem from religious beliefs.
Your argument is classic nonsense.
A person being "good" usual stems from religious beliefs. How is this idiocy?
A person being "good" usual stems from religious beliefs. How is this idiocy?
I think he does.Snake Lord said:You can't honestly believe that?
Yes, there is some hope for people without religion to be good, but the odds are better for people with religion.
Is this so hard for you atheists to understand?
No, indoctrinating children in leprechaunism would not be good for them. Chasing rainbows all day looking for imaginary pots of gold will result in a lot of dead people who should be spending their time farming and growing food.
The "odds" are derived from my experience.
A snake is a deceiver. A "snakelord" is the lord of deceivers, i.e. Satan. You seem to want your user name to reflect a relationship with Satan.
A snake is a deceiver. A "snakelord" is the lord of deceivers, i.e. Satan. You seem to want your user name to reflect a relationship with Satan.