Because his presence and creation are not denied. The detail, however, such as looks, remains unknown.
Why did god design men to have nipples?
- Thread starter s0meguy
- Start date
Because his presence and creation are not denied. The detail, however, such as looks, remains unknown.
Wow, that raises serious questions for any believer. If there was a god and the Bible is a its story, then it says that man was made first and woman followed.
So, if man was made first, there would be no reason to have genetils or nipples. So, did man used to not have either?
When God put man to sleep to take a rib and make woman, is that when God put genetils and nipples on?
Or, did God know what he was doing in the first place...and knew that it was going to make a female? But, if that's the case, why not make them both right away, why put Adam to sleep, take a rib, and make Eve??
Something's fishy here...
So, if man was made first, there would be no reason to have genetils or nipples. So, did man used to not have either?
When God put man to sleep to take a rib and make woman, is that when God put genetils and nipples on?
Or, did God know what he was doing in the first place...and knew that it was going to make a female? But, if that's the case, why not make them both right away, why put Adam to sleep, take a rib, and make Eve??
Something's fishy here...
Eventually women will get tired of breastfeeding; at that point they will lodge a formal complaint with God and ask for equal division of nastiness (menstrual cramps, PMS, pregnancy and labour, breastfeeding and nipple sores); in order to prepare for that exigency, God has provided men with nipples, giving them the choice of selecting the least icky one.
Last edited:
lmao, no. Fluffy white clouds are great! Does that make me gay?
I'm still waiting for a theist with a reasonable explanation... all I've seen is theists avoiding the main question and making off-topic posts.
What about our tail bone? Why would we have that according to you creationists?
Looks more like evidence for evolution to me...
What about our tail bone? Why would we have that according to you creationists?
Looks more like evidence for evolution to me...
You are assuming that everything has a reason. Why?
*************
M*W: The whole story of A&E is fishy, because it's a fish tale.
Because there is a reason for every decision.
Why would god decide to give us a useless tail bone?
Someguy: I made a post about this a little while back. No decent answers there either 
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=64962
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=64962
Human beings look for reason in every decision. Per se, why should there be any reason in any decision?
Enmos
Valued Senior Member
It all seems pretty straight-forward to me.. :shrug:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_vestigiality
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_vestigiality
Have you no sense of irony whatsoever? You start out this thread by pointing out that mens nipples are useless and this is an argument against creationism?
The real question is why do men have nipples if evolution is true?
Not denied by what...a holy book written in its name?
And this is now my objection to what you've said:
Undoubtedly, the concept of God has laudability ingrained into it. But how can you be sure this deity is worthy of worship if you can't even begin to speculate his qualities?
Last edited:
No that is not the real question because I didn't ask that question. Now can you answer the question or not? why did your god give us useless crap such as nipples on a male and tail bones?
I think you're just indulging in pointless speculation. Because one answer could be.
Because.
Thats it. There is no need for a reason.
However, if empirically, you feel that everything in the world should be there for a reason, you can devise a hypothesis and test it; however, you still have to realise that your hypothesis is based on the assumption that there is nothing in the universe without reason.