This is just a simple question. I always get confused when talking to atheists or agnostics when they suggest my understanding of God, Christ, and the Bible's intent cannot be different from previous generations.
This is just a simple question. I always get confused when talking to atheists or agnostics when they suggest my understanding of God, Christ, and the Bible's intent cannot be different from previous generations.
skaught-
actually the bible is only about 1500 years old. Before that it was Jewish law and treasured notes and sermons.
by my reading of the bible, I would suggest that the requirements for salvation are a) belief in God and b)belief in Jesus Christ. By these beliefs the commandments are all boiled down to love God, treat others as you would be treated. The rest is all chrome and polish.
I agree. I hate arguing with atheists because they simply can't understand the difference between scripture and concept.
Well, where do you get the concept if not from scripture ?
This is just a simple question. I always get confused when talking to atheists or agnostics when they suggest my understanding of God, Christ, and the Bible's intent cannot be different from previous generations.
You get scripture from concept, not the other way around.
Why can't the understanding of the christian God evolve over time?
the requirements for salvation are a) belief in God and b)belief in Jesus Christ
You get scripture from concept, not the other way around.
Why can't the understanding of the christian God evolve over time?
Enmos/Norsefire- As I understand the meaning here we have concept as knowledge scripture is a record of that knowledge, so if that is the case then we have to accept that God interacted directly with man for man to gain the knowledge to put into scripture, later generations you have man using scripture to gain knowledge. I guess it goes both directions, really. Secular texts are used in much the same way. Maybe I don't understand your argument, could you expand on this?