They are not religious.
We're looking for pro-social concepts that don't spring from religion... aren't we?
Thats debatable. I could bring up several scriptures that emphasize these concepts.
They are not religious.
We're looking for pro-social concepts that don't spring from religion... aren't we?
The fact that no athiest group has ever established a family, community or country anywhere in the world without first belonging to a theist family, community or country says it all. Even atheists are forced to admit that unlike theistic scriptures which speak volumes about relationships, atheism says nothing at all about any prosocial concepts.
Those scriptures would be written by humans. Prosocial concepts are humanist concepts. Theism gets its prosocial concepts from humanity and human nature. It gets its anti-social concepts from its own need for survival, power, domination, wealth, etc.
I am not sure why you don't realize this by now, but atheism isn't supposed to. It's non-acceptance of a single assertion. Addressing the title of the thread, the only "mean" thing I have noted is your attempt to declare people who don't accept that assertion as "mean".
Well duh, we're not as smart as all the atheists. What did you expect?
Does it bother you that lower IQ and / or education might result in theism?
Thats debatable. I could bring up several scriptures that emphasize these concepts.
Only as much as it bothers me that a black man is President of the US. And a woman might be next.
Then it seems like alot of effort just to create a thread to punish another one that doesn't really bother you.
Those scriptures would be written by humans. Prosocial concepts are humanist concepts. Theism gets its prosocial concepts from humanity and human nature. It gets its anti-social concepts from its own need for survival, power, domination, wealth, etc.
Even atheists are forced to admit that unlike theistic scriptures which speak volumes about relationships, atheism says nothing at all about any prosocial concepts.
So what. You are implying incorrectly that being an atheist is equated with a lack of pro-social concepts. Atheism has no pro-social concepts of itself, but being an atheist does not exclude one from having pro-social concepts, such as secular humanism.
In other words, you are saying that once one adopts atheism, you can then have no other concepts.
Not at all. You have it the other way around, I started this thread first. Besides, I don't get mad. I get even.
I see, so it just evolved into a punishment thread after the other one was made. It doesn't matter what you feel during an act of punishment or revenge... the act is still the act.
Thats debatable. I could bring up several scriptures that emphasize these concepts.
That's not relevant, Sam. If an ideology doesn't entail belief in some form of religion, then it's not religious.
You could also bring up scriptures that emphasize some key elements of communism... but so what?
Christian Communism
And what of libertarianism, socialism, environmentalism, and so forth?
Prosocial concepts without religion, right?
Like France?Any of them come up in an atheist society? :shrug: