are there even facts that souls exist?
I know I have a soul, as for others I believe the same applies
Can someone please define "soul" ?
I want to believe
Main Entry: 1soul
Pronunciation: 'sOl
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English soule, from Old English sAwol; akin to Old High German sEula soul
1 : the immaterial essence, animating principle, or actuating cause of an individual life
2 a : the spiritual principle embodied in human beings, all rational and spiritual beings, or the universe b capitalized, Christian Science : GOD 1b
3 : a person's total self
4 a : an active or essential part b : a moving spirit : LEADER
5 a : the moral and emotional nature of human beings b : the quality that arouses emotion and sentiment c : spiritual or moral force : FERVOR
6 : PERSON <not a soul in sight>
7 : PERSONIFICATION <she is the soul of integrity>
8 a : a strong positive feeling (as of intense sensitivity and emotional fervor) conveyed especially by black American performers b : NEGRITUDE c : SOUL MUSIC d : SOUL FOOD e : SOUL BROTHER
You're not alone. There are billions of people on the planet who also want to believe in souls, and gods, and angels, and devils and other such mind-numbing, thought-inhibiting nonsensical myth and superstition.
So, ask yourself WHY you want to believe in such things? Does it make you feel better? Does it give your life meaning and purpose? Does it change anything at all?
Ask yourself honestly what purpose there is to believing in such drivel?
it makes me happy to be deluded and believe in magical fairy tales.
hehe, nice to see some honesty.
when the baby forms consciousness and awareness, that would be a soul. The concept of a soul is not drivel.
Ask yourself why you feel emotions and sensation in your solar plexus or chest area??? It's just an organ, the heart right?? I don't feel emotion in my liver or calf muscle awwight?
It seems more strange people would not believe in a soul when everyone knows you not only have different sides to your personality with you as the central cpu but feel a sense of yourself and every emotional sensation and energy within your heart area and there is a whole life going on there which is quite different than pure cognitive thought.
when the baby forms consciousness and awareness, that would be a soul.
The concept of a soul is not drivel.
Ask yourself why you feel emotions and sensation in your solar plexus or chest area??? It's just an organ, the heart right?? I don't feel emotion in my liver or calf muscle awwight?
It seems more strange people would not believe in a soul when everyone knows you not only have different sides to your personality with you as the central cpu but feel a sense of yourself and every emotional sensation and energy within your heart area and there is a whole life going on there which is quite different than pure cognitive thought.
That would be the brain. Yes, the concept of a soul IS drivel.
You're NOT feeling emotions in your solar plexus or chest area. You're "feeling" a biochemical reaction initiated by your brain.
Biochemical reactions in your body are not indications of a soul, they are simply biochemical reactions.
Where's the evidence?
Of course its not. Its a human construct formed, apparently, as an argument from ignorance. If nothing else, humans are good at making things up to explain that which they haven't figured out yet. The word "soul" has little more relevance than the word "firmament" to describe the barrier of the sky which holds the stars in place, each equally distant from the Earth's surface.
That's is the most ignorant question I've heard on this forum in a long time. What you "feel" is chemicals like adrenaline, which are released in the heart naturally in times of stress, excitement, etc. This perceived feeling isn't a 'soul' at all. Does that mean my stomach has a soul when I feel varied pangs of hunger? Does that mean the gall bladder holds the soul because it has feelings when constricted around a stone? If so, I'm a soulless bastard since my gall bladder is absent.
But, more importantly, does the recipient of a heart transplant no longer have a soul? Or does he now have the soul of the donor?
I realize such rationality isn't a natural frame of mind for the credulous or those who generally afraid to question their pre-conceived beliefs. But even a modicum of critical thought eliminates the belief that a 'soul' exists in the heart. Once that's excluded, the same process can be applied over and over throughout the body to arrive at the single anatomical part that has been demonstrated to affect personality and behavior if damaged, disrupted or changed: the brain.
The myth of the soul would appear to be nothing more than the set of neural processes and systems that exist within the human brain.
Most of that paragraph made little sense, but if you consider the 'soul' to be the sum of the neural processes that exist within the brain and cerebral cortex, then I agree. Humans (and other animals) have souls for as long as the neurons and synapses in these tissues continue to work.
It doesn't matter what initiated it, because there is energy and a sense of yourself like a fingerprint and that can be called a soul.