hansda said:Examples can be given (other than frame-dragging ) , which can show that space moves physically .
Was this meant as a question or you have reference for some other example?
hansda said:Examples can be given (other than frame-dragging ) , which can show that space moves physically .
Was this meant as a question or you have reference for some other example?
That's twice you've made the claim.I have reference for some other example , which shows that space is moving physically like matter .
I see it as a stack of index cards. If you exist outside of time you can flip through the index cards like a flip book. On every card is a moment of life. With a beggining and an ending.
If time is this then something has to exist that drew these cards and can observe them.
Space moves physically? Yes, it can be said to do that but it doesn't displace within itself or anything as matter can from what I see.
Does it?When the atom moves , its atomic-space is also moving alongwith the atom
Nope.So, this is a clear evidence that ; space moves physically .
Does it?
Or are you just assuming?
Nope.
Your unfounded assumptions aren't evidence.
This is equivalent to claiming that the space inside a cardboard box is the same "space" regardless of where the box is moved to.
Just as cardboard box-space is an integral part of of the cardboard box.Atomic-space is the integral part of an atom . Without this space an atom is incomplete .
Just as cardboard box-space is an integral part of of the cardboard box.
Without this space a cardboard box is incomplete.
You're assuming again.
Can you prove (or even demonstrate) that "atomic-space" is an integral part of an atom?
Read about atomic structure .
Space moves physically? Yes, it can be said to do that but it doesn't displace within itself or anything as matter can from what I see.
In other words you're just assuming and can't support your claim.Read about atomic structure .
The fact that there is space between the electron shells and the nucleus does not mean that this space is an integral part of the atom, that is what you have to give evidence for.
Just because you believe it to be true does not make it true - you are required to give evidence. It is that whole science thing...
You're either missing Hansda's point completely or you're indulging in your usual non-sequitur nonsensical ramblings.Space is an integral part of the universe... Does that not trump this quarrel over something as small as an atom?
This is one of the main concepts in Kurt Vonnegut's book Slaughterhouse 5.
Why?
It makes much more sense for their to be divine intervention following a plan all along, than complete randomness.
I dont believe a billion random events occured after the previous billions of random events that had to have occured for me to exist. It makes much more sense for their to be divine intervention following a plan all along, than complete randomness.