well I suggest that until there is real physical aspect to other Universes that we just put this aside and deal with the Universe we are in, physically
What is time??
- Thread starter Shadow1
- Start date
well I suggest that until there is real physical aspect to other Universes that we just put this aside and deal with the Universe we are in, physically
They have found physical answers as well. The background noise of our Universe has 4 sort of dimples. You could call them pressure spots of other Universe. There is no need to question other Universe, if this one exists you have proof of one, so you also have proof of many.
" background noise "
from where
ohh... I will question
one of , does not follow that there should be many of
Should = 1
Could = 0.5
Question = 0.5
Question = Could
You SHOULD have said COULD!
opps , sorry to expand your thinking
Cosmic microwave background radiation.
the problem is though , is that they can only discount , from other sources , galaxies , from so far out and its not very far
maybe , three or four galaxies out as far as being a sourse of this radiation
you have then , the whole of the Universe which can contribute to the microwave sourse
Yeah well in this forum we are not too open to speculation. I am just telling you what they have found so far. Then you can decide what you want to go with.
its not speculation it is true
perhaps and hopefully this forum will become more open
fair enough
then WE can all decide what to go with
If you join the top to the bottom of your quotes you can see why WE doesn't work. I have a theory, science has a theory, and you have a theory.
I wouldn't have a theory if I thought it was unreasonable.
hmmm...
didn't answer my question
My theory to ME is perfect.
understanding isn't about you though
You mean nature. I have only given you the scientific answers in this thread. If you want to get into individual theories you have to go into either Pseudo science, or Alternative theories.
no , I mean you and any like you
I shouldn't have to go to either
I mean , what do you want , really , what do you want , some phoney theories
or truth
because the Universe doesn't care , it doesn't
it does what it does
now here we are , Humans , a living being
we have to care about selves
I wouldn't have a theory if I thought it was unreasonable.
I often present things from perspectives that are not completely consistent with what I believe to be an accurate description of either science or experience. I sometimes play the devil's advocate...
In other words, I sometimes present an opposite or contrary explanation or interpretation, in an effort to open up the parameters of a discussion.
I think that creating some distinction between explanations and theories that are generally accepted and those that are not, is a good practice. For one thing, in principle, it should allow for some greater degree of freedom.., brainstorming so to speak, than if all posts and ideas were required to meet the same semi-ridged standards of currently accepted science. The only way to do this, with any possible success is to provide some separation between the two.
That is currently achieved through separating the Science folder from the On The Fringe folder.
It may not be something that everyone needs to know the difference between mainstream science and fringe theories, but for some it is almost required. This is an open public forum and clearly separating the two, is important.
yes and no
for me its about who you are talking and discussing with really
some of the mainstream have an open mind
but for the most part , the mainstream doesn't have much of an open mind , they have a mind set , which won't give , the are afraid of the consequences of agreeing of thinking outside the box
Well I am thinking of the students. Nobody can really cope with my theory in an argument apart from me, so it wouldn't help them.