Ya know Bebalina the other thing about you that amazes me besides your use of circular logic is your insistance on denying you said something when its all on record.
First you say that you never called me closed minded I adressed that in my last post so you can just look it up there. But than you deny saying that you have to believe in something to believe in it
Sound familiar?
An a little not about how blatently wrong the statement is. Nobody believed in General Realitivity untill experimental evidence backed it up.
At least in my opinion it means the same thing as what you denied saying.
BELIEF AND EVIDENE ARE THE SAME THING. THE ONLY REASON ANYONE SHOULD BELIEVE ANYTHING IS BECAUSE OF THE EVIDENCE TO BACK IT UP. SINCE FROM A SCIENTIFIC STANDPOINT PROOF CAN NEVER BE ACHIEVED EVIDENCE IS ALL THERE IS. IF YOUR GOING TO ARGUE A POINT GIVE EVIDENCE BASED ON A NON-CIRCULAR BASIS.
First you say that you never called me closed minded I adressed that in my last post so you can just look it up there. But than you deny saying that you have to believe in something to believe in it
you must beleive to get proof
Sound familiar?
An a little not about how blatently wrong the statement is. Nobody believed in General Realitivity untill experimental evidence backed it up.
At least in my opinion it means the same thing as what you denied saying.
BELIEF AND EVIDENE ARE THE SAME THING. THE ONLY REASON ANYONE SHOULD BELIEVE ANYTHING IS BECAUSE OF THE EVIDENCE TO BACK IT UP. SINCE FROM A SCIENTIFIC STANDPOINT PROOF CAN NEVER BE ACHIEVED EVIDENCE IS ALL THERE IS. IF YOUR GOING TO ARGUE A POINT GIVE EVIDENCE BASED ON A NON-CIRCULAR BASIS.
Last edited: