no offense but, the sciences are rather obvious.
In what way? Obvious, as in you have a complete understanding of them?
well phlog, what if real things exist that you can not see with your eye, even with the aid of a microscope, or a telescope, or an imaging system? hmmm?
We devise an experiment to test them, and do exactly that, and publish the results and method, and people test the method, and see if they get the same results. Simple. If they are real, and interact with the real world, we can do this, and we do.
i don't abandon that. and if your reasoning is subjective, then who is to say that your reasoning isn't flawed even when observing objective things?
That's the whole point of the scientific method! We understand our reasoning can be subjective, so do everything to remove human influence from steering the results. We gain objectivity by not ignoring things we don't like, and not weighing things we do more highly.
which is in fact what i am proposing in regards to atheism.
It's simply a lack of belief. If there were demonstrable proof, if would not be a matter of debate.
also, i have found that the results of interactions with god and a relationship with god, among many people, are very much the same.
Here's the flaw. A vague correlation is just that. Vague. You would need to match some specific criteria with a good degree of repetition to prove there was something behind it all, giving you the same results.
you said "spiritual". please do tell. *alluring dance*
I also said upon investigation I understood the causes. I only use the word spiritual to describe the feelings, (elation, inner peace, that kind of stuff). I do not for one moment think I have a spirit.