Physics pwns everything.
Last edited:
what is a god (define please)
- Thread starter the preacher
- Start date
so as far as we know the one true god is made up from about 30 million others, is blue or grey, he exists but does'nt exist, and his name is krishna, or it's the sun.(this according to jan,vital, and qorl.
am I right so far.
they each pieced together a strange definition, but a definition all the same.
I would of liked a more sensible one, and the only one so far has come from an atheist "god is physics" that is a f**king good definition.
pete, dont try to talk logic with reasonable people your out of your, depth.
and evidence pete, evidence, show some f**king evidence.(wow superhuman, supernatural, "Bo**ocks")
am I right so far.
they each pieced together a strange definition, but a definition all the same.
I would of liked a more sensible one, and the only one so far has come from an atheist "god is physics" that is a f**king good definition.
pete, dont try to talk logic with reasonable people your out of your, depth.
and evidence pete, evidence, show some f**king evidence.(wow superhuman, supernatural, "Bo**ocks")
Mosheh Thezion said:
I'll try.
Here is a description of His Universal Form by Arjuna;
Jan.
It is whatever you concieve it to be.
"We are all atheists about most of the gods that humanity has ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further."
the preacher said:
Hey preacher,
I don't think you got the point of the quotes. God isn't one concrete definable thing. Also, you say that I said God is Krishna, however if you read those quotes you would understand "God" is not a particular person, and does not belong to a particular nation. Also a sensible definition exists in one of the quotes I gave:
"The Supreme Personality of Godhead has no beginning, no end and no middle. Nor does He belong to a particular person or nation. He has no inside or outside. The dualities found within this material world, such as beginning and end, mine and theirs, are all absent from the personality of the Supreme Lord. The universe, which emanates from Him, is another feature of the Lord. Therefore the Supreme Lord is the ultimate truth, and He is complete in greatness"
God is physics? Well that's true from Krishna's perspective, as physics is an ultimate truth.
or the sun, no I said you, jan and qorl, had made definitions, and yes I understood your definition.VitalOne said:
theres nothing sensible about a god and no sensible definition could come from someone who believes in a god, however I willing to listen to your views, although they can only be totally subjective.VitalOne said:
hence why I said "it exists but does'nt exist".VitalOne said:
krishna is classed as a godhead.
krishna is but the pinnacle of over 30 million gods.
My Perfect Proof for the Non-Existence of God
P1 If the theory of gravity were in fact true we would all have condensed into an infinitely small singularity
P2 We have not condensed into an infinitely small singularity
C God does not exist
Your First Perfect Proof for the Existence of God
P1 If the universe existed eternally man would have evolved to be perfect
P2 Man has not evolved to be perfect
C Therefore mankind is 6000 years old, the creation myth in Genesis is true and the God of the bible exists
Notice how the first premises in both cases badly distort the science they revolve around? Notice how the second premises then point out how a certain aspect of the distorted version of said scientific does not obtain? Notice how both arguments finish with non-sequiturs? Clearly if my argument is invalid then so is yours since they both have the same features and the same If P then Q not Q therefore G or not G formats.
P1 If the theory of gravity were in fact true we would all have condensed into an infinitely small singularity
P2 We have not condensed into an infinitely small singularity
C God does not exist
Your First Perfect Proof for the Existence of God
P1 If the universe existed eternally man would have evolved to be perfect
P2 Man has not evolved to be perfect
C Therefore mankind is 6000 years old, the creation myth in Genesis is true and the God of the bible exists
Notice how the first premises in both cases badly distort the science they revolve around? Notice how the second premises then point out how a certain aspect of the distorted version of said scientific does not obtain? Notice how both arguments finish with non-sequiturs? Clearly if my argument is invalid then so is yours since they both have the same features and the same If P then Q not Q therefore G or not G formats.
Nothing sensible about a God and no sensible definition could come from someone who believes in a God? Can you please clarify, I don't see how the definition isn't sensible.the preacher said:
Why do you atheists think you're so superior to everyone else? Ironically, it's the same type of mentality that people who burned others for having views against the Bible...
So I'm guessing your definition of "exists" is some type of physical, material substance, right? So in your opinion, things like time, vacuum energy, electromagnetic waves, etc...also "exists but doesn't exist"???the preacher said:
Those 30 milliion gods are not really gods, they're devas, where as Krishna is equal to Narayana, smaller than the smallest (literally), the supersoul within all beings (even the demons). You make it seem as if it's similar to Zeus in Greek mythology. You seem to be trapped in Western mentality, of this is your God and this is my God.the preacher said:
snake river rufus
Registered Senior Member
god is a belief created by people needing to believe.
you cannot be serious, how can a subjective thing be taken seriously, if you changed the word god for the tooth fairy, would it still be sensible.VitalOne said:
quote: "The Supreme Personality of the tooth fairy has no beginning, no end and no middle. Nor does He belong to a particular person or nation. He has no inside or outside. The dualities found within this material world, such as beginning and end, mine and theirs, are all absent from the personality of the Supreme tooth fairy. The universe, which emanates from Him, is another feature of the tooth fairy. Therefore the Supreme tooth fairy is the ultimate truth, and He is complete in greatness"
no comparison, those were uneducated religious fanatics, the atheist has the utmost respect to life and the living.therefore could never deprive any body from there chance to live.VitalOne said:
no anything that can objectively effect one or all the senses.VitalOne said:
not so, these can be measured, and therefore effect one or all of the senses.VitalOne said:
in your subjective opinion.VitalOne said:
well it is, it's just as subjective.VitalOne said: