Lightgigantic,
You're a pseudo-intellectual wannabe that relies on smart-arse facile responses quite devoid of substance, not to mention rationality, reason or logic.
You were asked a couple of simple questions that might have lead to a mutual understanding, but you prefer to maintain a juvenile mystery and pose questions in return.
Your only use to me is to hone my skills in the humiliation and derision of bubble-brains like you and your ilk.
#382 P.20 is your first post in the previous ten pages.
Originally Posted by earth
I am still waiting for God to produce a vaccine of any kind.
LG responds; I am still waiting for materialism to solve the problem of birth, death, old age and disease and suffering in the form of one's own body and mind, the body and minds of other living entities and the experience of excesses of climate and environment (heat, earthquakes, bush fires etc)
We are left with the conclusion you are convinced that tearful prayer will be more efficacious. Material, mainstream science has already solved many of the "problems" you raise. No input of prayer had a measurable effect in major scientific studies. It is reasonable therefore to prefer the materialism of science over your palsied superstitions and quaint fantasies.
Your post #382 reveals nought but ignorance of material science and a supercilious expectation that everything should be solved at once just for you. If material science can't meet your expectations you'll stamp your feet and hold your breath until you turn blue. Expectation of the perfect is a pipe-dream in the real material world. When you grow up you'll realise that and be a much more entertaing debater.
The cardinal sins of debate in discussion groups are immaturity, predictability and boring your interlocutors. You've achieved all three with astounding success.
OriginalBiggles, Prime
You're a pseudo-intellectual wannabe that relies on smart-arse facile responses quite devoid of substance, not to mention rationality, reason or logic.
You were asked a couple of simple questions that might have lead to a mutual understanding, but you prefer to maintain a juvenile mystery and pose questions in return.
Your only use to me is to hone my skills in the humiliation and derision of bubble-brains like you and your ilk.
#382 P.20 is your first post in the previous ten pages.
Originally Posted by earth
I am still waiting for God to produce a vaccine of any kind.
LG responds; I am still waiting for materialism to solve the problem of birth, death, old age and disease and suffering in the form of one's own body and mind, the body and minds of other living entities and the experience of excesses of climate and environment (heat, earthquakes, bush fires etc)
We are left with the conclusion you are convinced that tearful prayer will be more efficacious. Material, mainstream science has already solved many of the "problems" you raise. No input of prayer had a measurable effect in major scientific studies. It is reasonable therefore to prefer the materialism of science over your palsied superstitions and quaint fantasies.
Your post #382 reveals nought but ignorance of material science and a supercilious expectation that everything should be solved at once just for you. If material science can't meet your expectations you'll stamp your feet and hold your breath until you turn blue. Expectation of the perfect is a pipe-dream in the real material world. When you grow up you'll realise that and be a much more entertaing debater.
The cardinal sins of debate in discussion groups are immaturity, predictability and boring your interlocutors. You've achieved all three with astounding success.
OriginalBiggles, Prime
