And I'll bet that, being a public bus, there are rules against loud, obnoxious people riding that bus!
I don't know. Check with the bus company. Considering the driver's supervisor was very unimpressed with the driver's comments, I would imagine the rules for mentally disabled people are moot, since you know, mentally disabled people sometimes lack the self control you seem to expect others to have. If you are, for example, drunk and being loud, disruptive and rude, then the driver would have a right to tell you to stop. But an autistic child? Err no.
Now the question you need to answer, do you think a small autistic child is obnoxious on purpose?
My bet is that there are specific rules against loud, obnoxious behavior on public buses and subways. It has nothing to do with medical conditions, etc. it has to do with the comfort of all of the other passengers.
Actually no. It has everything to do with the medical condition of the passenger. Did the other passengers complain? Or was it just the driver who demanded to know what was wrong with her child? In fact, he is not allowed to even ask such a question, as it is discriminatory and down right rude.
How do you think it would be if all of the passengers were as loud and as obnoxious as that little kid? Pretty damned uncomfortable, huh? And yet here you're arguing to allow one person to break the rules to the detriment of all of the other passengers? ...as if the other passengers don't have any rights, or certainly not the right to ride the bus in peace!
I wouldn't particularly care. But here you are, the great defender of the law, saying that the bus driver should break the law, all for comfort.
And you shouldn't have to put up with that either! No one should have to put up with loud, obnoxious noise and distrubances like that.
Lets say you are on a bus, and a person has an epileptic fit and causes a disturbance. Should the driver be allowed to throw them off? You see Baron, there is disturbance and there is disturbance. One is self induced and the other is completely out of one's control. Do you see the difference? Guess which one the autistic child falls under.
We put up with you even though you are "loud, obnoxious" and disturbing. If I were to follow your line of reasoning, you should be banned outright for disturbing the enjoyment of others on this site. Now we both know you can control it, since you do not suffer a mental illness. So what should we do Baron? What would be fair to you? Hmmm?
Imagine this site is the bus and you are the loud child.
So you can't control him, huh? But you expect others to put up with it in public places??
It's your fault for taking him out into such places ...when you can't control his actions.
What do you propose? That she beat him for being loud, even though his medical condition means that she actually cannot control him? Not let him out of the house in case he offend's people's delicate sensibilities?
Tie him up in a straight jacket, and gag him before you enter the bus! Or call for special transportation ...which the government will be expected to pay for!!
Your compassion is astounding.
He is free to ride the public transport as he and his mother so chooses. As an American, I would have expected that you would fight for his freedom and his
right to ride that public bus Baron.
And I think that's all the bus driver wanted too.
No dear. The bus driver plainly stated that he would not allow anyone with a mental/medical handicap because
he thinks they should be locked away in a home. There's a big difference there.
He is basically breaking the law because of a personal belief, which in effect discriminates against mentally handicapped people. It is illegal to discriminate against mentally ill people in such a way Baron. I can't believe you actually support the driver's illegal acts.