(shrugs) so what-- i have no inkling of care-- so now what?You are talking to us, and to us your claims are not supported. If that is as far as you intend to go then all you have done is effectively say "You're wrong... but you'll just have to trust me". You're surely intelligent enough (since you claim to be a tier one scientist) to comprehend how you come across to us and how your trust alone won't wash as support?
Correct about what? I'm merely asking you not to make claims that you are unwilling to support. I am making no claims. If you're willing to support your claims, great. If not, whether 'cos your unwilling or, say, legally unable, really doesn't make a blind bit of difference.
Those in the know, as you claim to be, are irrelevant to those who aren't unless they can provide not only claims but the support for those claims that will convince those other people.
Are you irrelevant to us?
also-- i have also clearly stated that i also have no inkling of care if i am believed or not-- so now what (shrugs)
" I'm merely asking you not to make claims that you are unwilling to support. "-- i have stated, " it is not that my claims are not supported, it is a matter of whom is talking to me claiming that my claims are not supported-- get it now? "--which obviously you did not get it.
" I am making no claims. "-- well then, why are you even in this conversation?
" ...unless they can provide not only claims but the support for those claims that will convince those other people. "--for the umpteenth time-- for whom though--the public?
" Are you irrelevant to us? "-- yes exactly, but on my end and from my employer's stance--it is you that is irrelevant, which is why i am endlessly using the word " piss-ant " for such argumentative individuals.
Last edited: