What do you wish that those who in any way promote their religious tradition would teach you?
On the contrary, I would be doing the teaching. You could alternately call it...deprogramming.What do you wish that those who in any way promote their religious tradition would teach you?
I wish they would teach me how to appreciate their religious tradition.
Not really an answer to the question you asked... But I guess tolerance. Theists are happy in that which they "believe" to be true. And I have no problem with that. Allow me the same courtesy. Don't push beliefs on those that don't share the same theories or "dogma". If I wanted to understand what they are pushing, I'd ask.. I don't need God in my life, why would he need me in his? But the bible thumpers say I will go to hell if I don't submit to their God's will.Maybe, I will just create my own God, along with it's own doctrine, and if the Theists don't follow it, I will threaten them with hell as well... Sorry for the rant.
definite morals would be a great teaching. maybe more practice in what people preach as well. If ya don't practice all the ideas you supposedly hold true. don't preach them.
One either appreciates what they hear or they don't.
It's got very little to do with the giver. (Well it should have very little to do with the giver) It's all about the message and the one hearing it. The Hearer is the one who controls the level of appreciation, or otherwise, they have.
No that does not hold true. I have watched a doco on recovering alcoholics. And i listened to one of them give a very impressive speech full of emotion against alcoholism. The guy left the unit but 3 months later he was back in with the same problem.
I never doubted the guys’ rejection of alcoholism when he declared it with passion and the message was true and good. Just because He could not live up to the truth of his convictions does not make those convictions false. So that they should never be shared with others.
Originally Posted by Adstar
One either appreciates what they hear or they don't.
It's got very little to do with the giver. (Well it should have very little to do with the giver) It's all about the message and the one hearing it. The Hearer is the one who controls the level of appreciation, or otherwise, they have.
So according to you, forced conversions, the Spanish Inquisition, early (forceful) indoctrination, or proselytizers rattling down the Gospel message in 30 seconds to a stranger in the street - are all allright?
You seem to think that this analogy is justified. On the grounds of what do you think this reasoning "Even if someone doesn't manage to live up to their convictions, does not mean those convictions are false" applies to spiritual life?
If you can't live a conviction, how do you know it is true?
It's got very little to do with the giver. (Well it should have very little to do with the giver) It's all about the message and the one hearing it. The Hearer is the one who controls the level of appreciation, or otherwise, they have.
So according to you, forced conversions, the Spanish Inquisition, early (forceful) indoctrination, or proselytizers rattling down the Gospel message in 30 seconds to a stranger in the street - are all allright?