It has been changed.
The bible contradicts what you believers say.
Genesis 1:27 NKJV: So God created man in His
own image; in the image of God He created
him; male and female He created
them.
Genesis 3:1 NCV: Now the snake was the most clever of all the wild animals the Lord God had made. One day the snake said to the woman, “Did God really say that you must not eat fruit from any tree in the garden?”
Genesis 19 NKJV: Then they made their father drink wine that night also. And the younger arose and lay with him, and he did not know when she lay down or when she arose. Thus both the daughters of Lot were with child by their father.
That's what the Bible says.
If you want to alter it to support your agenda, feel free. But I will laugh at any attempt to claim that your altered version is the "true" version.
You can argue all you like, but you cannot show where God created two human beings, to incestuously create the diversity we see in the human race today.
That is fundamentally absurd.
Of course it is.
It's also absurd to claim that God created Man from dust, given that humans are mostly water. It's absurd to claim that the Earth was created 6000 years ago, or that Adam lived 930 years, or that Noah got two of every single land animal onto a boat. But that is what the Bible
SAYS. Right there, in black and white. Why not accept it, instead of trying to deny it and substitute your own claims?
Exactly.
Genesis 1:27 NKJV: So God created man in His
own image; in the image of God He created
him; male and female He created
them.
Genesis 3:1 NCV: Now the snake was the most clever of all the wild animals the Lord God had made. One day the snake said to the woman, “Did God really say that you must not eat fruit from any tree in the garden?”
Genesis 19 NKJV: Then they made their father drink wine that night also. And the younger arose and lay with him, and he did not know when she lay down or when she arose. Thus both the daughters of Lot were with child by their father.
I would have to ignore the translated words, I would have to pretend that incest was used to create human race.
You don't have to pretend anything. The Bible isn't literally true. Even though it says that Adam was the first man, and all humans came from Adam and Eve - it's a myth. It's not literally true. Genesis isn't even one myth; it is two, concatenated together. That's why they contradict one another.
I would have to turn a blind eye to the variety in humans we see today
No, you would have to accept what is actually written in the Bible - and that the Bible isn't literally true. And that would crush your entire belief system. And we have all seen to what silly lengths you will go to to defend your belief system.
).
......
