you asked "Do you deny any of the tenets of evolution posted above under Darwin's picture?"
i said "yes".
i will discuss this no further with you.
Ok Ill assume you're having a bad day :shrug:
you asked "Do you deny any of the tenets of evolution posted above under Darwin's picture?"
i said "yes".
i will discuss this no further with you.
maybe.It's stupid, plain and simple.
There's no need to appeal to the divine when discussing morality, there's no need to appeal to anything other than survival instinct. Altruism is just another tool for survival.
i do not deny anyone of their opinion.
yes.
listen dude i've been forbidden to post what i know.
you asked "Do you deny any of the tenets of evolution posted above under Darwin's picture?"
i said "yes".
i will discuss this no further with you.
maybe.
i am in no position to stipulate, especially in regards to morality, what is stupid for the future generations of humanity on this planet.
play the idiot james, you seem to be good at it.By whom?
if administrators are indeed capable of racking up infraction points then i demand james get one for misrepresentation because he knows full well i have been forbidden to post what i know.Don't go telling lies, though.
play the idiot james, you seem to be good at it.
if administrators are indeed capable of racking up infraction points then i demand james get one for misrepresentation because he knows full well i have been forbidden to post what i know.
You have no special knowledge about creationism that disproves evolution, so lying about it as if you have some great insight that we're censoring you for is deceitful.
Back in your box, leopold.
I'm a latecomer to this forum, but I notice the denialists here are reluctant to take on Darwin's theory as it is actually stated.
I don't have a question for you, merely an observation, that if they weren't just trolling it seems they would at least step up to the plate and address the actual language of these 8 elements.
After all, that's what it all boils down to (excluding the neo-Darwinian updates to the list).
I do not think you are in any position to judge at present Leo.play the idiot james, you seem to be good at it.
Just to clarify...if administrators are indeed capable of racking up infraction points then i demand james get one for misrepresentation because he knows full well i have been forbidden to post what i know.
To remain a creationist after that requires quite a bloody-minded denial of reality.
Can you please cite proof of this and failing that, could you please cite this truth that you know about evolution?
(@leopold): Can you please cite proof of this and failing that, could you please cite this truth that you know about evolution?
That is a big if in that tenet.Every species is fertile enough that if all offspring survived to reproduce the population would grow.
there's no excuse for you james.Excuse me?
your attention span cannot possibly be that short.On the one hand, you hit the "report" button about my supposedly terrible crime of daring to ask you what the hell you're talking about, and on the other hand you deliver a personal insult for which I could rightly call for you to be warned or banned.
accusing someone of lying when you KNOW full well they aren't is a misrepresentation james.Don't you think it's "idiotic" to attract attention to yourself by reporting somebody for a nothing while you simultaneously break the site rules yourself? Are you familiar with the word "hypocrite"?
baseless? huh?I haven't misrepresented anything, to my knowledge, so your silly accusation is baseless.
you rub my nose in it and you don't expect me to reciprocate?Your insult, of course, is rude and unwelcome.
i never said i did.You have no special knowledge about creationism that disproves evolution, . . .
stop accusing me of lying.so lying about it as if you have some great insight that we're censoring you for is deceitful.
good show for the masses james.Back in your box, leopold.
there's no excuse for you james.
accusing someone of lying when you KNOW full well they aren't is a misrepresentation james.
first you tell me i can't post the information i have under threat of ban, then you tell me i'm lying when i say i can't post what i know, then you say my accusations are baseless.
you're a genius james!
you rub my nose in it and you don't expect me to reciprocate?
i never said i did.
Do it leopold.leopold:
Yes you did - in the very post I'm replying to. You insinuate that you have some ground-breaking information that you're forbidden to impart.
Tell us all these amazing facts of yours. Now is your chance. No more censorship. Speak as freely as you wish on the topic.
I await your insights with baited breath.
Originally Posted by James R
leopold:
Yes you did - in the very post I'm replying to. You insinuate that you have some ground-breaking information that you're forbidden to impart.
Tell us all these amazing facts of yours. Now is your chance. No more censorship. Speak as freely as you wish on the topic.
That is a big if in that tenet.
That is more like it, 1 out of 1,000 survive, the odds are sometimes millions to one.1. Every species is fertile enough that if all offspring survived to reproduce the population would grow.
Those of course aren't Darwin's actual words, just a summary. Here's just one of the many related statements in the Origin of Species
A plant which annually produces a thousand seeds, of which on an average only one comes to maturity, may be more truly said to struggle with the plants of the same and other kinds which already clothe the ground.
Remarkable for a man who had little more than a brass sextant and plumb bob to guide him in his search for understanding.