omniscience? Hardly - common sense, yes dHow are you enjoying your omniscience?
omniscience? Hardly - common sense, yes dHow are you enjoying your omniscience?
The media publicity is just a happy coincidence.common sense doesn't preclude hidden variables and the unknown - it simply looks at what is rather than what could be
I don't see this as some giant conspiracy to cause a media storm in order to attract business - I see it as an unknown that can be solved; throwing wild speculation into the mix without evidence is just foolish
The media publicity is just a happy coincidence.
The TV stations always are trying to find the cheapest way to make programs. That said there's very little money put into making those shows about "phenomenon" For all you need is a camera and someone holding it and talking about allot of nonsense which costs very little.
And if you claimed aliens pushed you, then MR could start another thread about it.I could step off a curb wrong, twist my ankle, and land on a pregnant lady and it'd end up in the media...
And if you claimed aliens pushed you, then MR could start another thread about it.
Which is exactly what it (and MR) is relying upon.we need more information to make an informed decision... information we are not likely to get.
But that's exactly what got us here. This thread is in the UFO/Ghosts forum and "ghosts" is all over the OP's article! Wild speculation that conforms to the laws of physics is DIALING BACK the foolishness!....I see it as an unknown that can be solved; throwing wild speculation into the mix without evidence is just foolish
It's a simple geometry calculation: about 600 psi to accelerate it at 1g. So you wouldn't want to use a 1/8" nozzle. 1/4" (150 psi) or 1/2" 38 psi) would be better.From a blast of air under the 4 pound cake cover... how many PSI from a 1/8" nozzel woud it take to blow the cake cover off its stand.???
Now thats a good idea Kitt... any volenteers to take a shot at doin the physics to find the necessary air pressure to blow the cake cover off.???
I'm not sure how you intend that to apply. Lack of evidence for what? Ghosts? Ghosts is not a default hypothesis, it is an affirmative claim that requires actual evidence to be considered. Lack of evidence for ghosts does not prove an air piston was used and lack of evidence for an air piston does not prove it was a ghost. So what we have here is just a mildly interesting video that doesn't prove anything. Ultimately, it is pointless.Unfortunately, in this case, I have to use an old saying I like; Lack of evidence is not evidence to the contrary.
No, you are falling into MR's burden of proof shifting trap. Alternate, mundane explanations do not have to be proven, they just need to be viable.Inventing ever more grand and complicated "traditional" methods to pull this off... while they could be done, have they been done and are they practical are questions we must consider.
I'm not sure how you intend that to apply. Lack of evidence for what? Ghosts? Ghosts is not a default hypothesis, it is an affirmative claim that requires actual evidence to be considered. Lack of evidence for ghosts does not prove an air piston was used and lack of evidence for an air piston does not prove it was a ghost. So what we have here is just a mildly interesting video that doesn't prove anything. Ultimately, it is pointless.
Any mundane explanation, no matter how complicated, is still way more plausible than any supernatural explanation. And that's only because there is (absolutely always) an utter lack of evidence for a supernatural explanation.Unfortunately, in this case, I have to use an old saying I like; Lack of evidence is not evidence to the contrary.
Inventing ever more grand and complicated "traditional" methods to pull this off... while they could be done, have they been done and are they practical are questions we must consider.
Any mundane explanation, no matter how complicated, is still way more plausible than any supernatural explanation. And that's only because there is (absolutely always) an utter lack of evidence for a supernatural explanation.
You do agree, right?
Maybe they wanted to fabricate a ghost video. It's still a hell of a lot more plausible than any supernatural explanation.Indeed - my point is that we should stop trying to fabricate super-complex mundane explanations... again, I ask, why in the world would a bakery have an air compressor capable of in excess of 60 PSI?