Victor Espinoza's: Thread of Intrigue

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dispersive_Prism.jpg


Sunlight is made up of all the colours we can see, plus other wavelengths we cannot see.
 
victorespinoza said:
In the video, what inflates the balloon? if it is sealed:
Click to expand...

The balloon is filled with a gas, Carbon Dioxide perhaps.
When it is submerged in a bath of liquid Nitrogen, the gas turns into a solid and the balloon shrinks.
When the balloon is taken out of the frozen Nitrogen, it warms up and the solid Dry Ice turns back into a gas.
The pressure of the gas increases as the balloon gets warmer and the balloon inflates.
 
victorespinoza said:
A photon when you look at it burning you eyes, as when you look at a light bulb or the Sun
Click to expand...

Bright light (lots of photons) "burns" your eyes. Dim light (fewer photons) does not.
So what, there are two waves (for mis conclusions of my analysis)

1.- A when you look at the Sun,
2.- And another when you look at the color of a wall.
Click to expand...

The photons are exactly the same. We can prove this in a lab.
 
Refuting relativity now, Victor?

Seems to be an almost mandatory stage in the progression from "guy with an unusual idea" to "crank."
 
Victor, you are not allowed to give links to your own websites.
Stop it now.
If you get banned again there will be no getting back.
 
victorespinoza said:
Already checked with an experiment and a rope, where the fan pushed forward.

This proves that the force of the wind that creates a fan, is stronger than the force of the blades to back.

This breaks the law of physics.

The propellant "VEEG-BOX-HOUSE-1", yes it works.


Very affectionately,
Victor Elias Espinoza Guedez
T.S.U. in computer science

January 22, 2014
Click to expand...

So because a fan can move air and push a rope without sliding itself backwards, you think you have broken the laws of physics...? Even though that model you just stated follows every law of physics to a T?
 
Propellant "VEEG-VICZARELIZ" with two (2) propellers on an airplane.

veeg-viczareliz-i-2.jpg



Very affectionately,
Victor Elias Espinoza Guedez
06 February 2014
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why Victor! You have just drawn a picture of a wind tunnel. There are hundreds out there, some with megawatts worth of fans. None have flown away yet, though.
 
billvon said:
Why Victor! You have just drawn a picture of a wind tunnel. There are hundreds out there, some with megawatts worth of fans. None have flown away yet, though.
Click to expand...

Please give me more details. Thank you.
 
Victor,
Are you trying to generate a perpetual motion system using a fan driven by it's own exhaust? If so then I'm sorry to say but you will fail, It won't work, it will never work.

If a fan is placed into such a closed system, then you have to add airflow to get it started, and even then the energy translation from airflow to fan and back wouldn't be 100% efficient, so over time your system would lose energy causing it to fail. (And that's a generous explanation, considering it wouldn't even run long enough to see that happen.)

Aircraft aren't just reliant upon propellers pulling a volume of air through to generate momentum, they also require overall flow to generate lift through aerodynamics, placing a couple of closed system propellers on an aircraft would just result in an expensive show of not understanding simple physics laws and how they are applied.
 
Stryder said:
Victor,
Are you trying to generate a perpetual motion system using a fan driven by it's own exhaust? If so then I'm sorry to say but you will fail, It won't work, it will never work.

If a fan is placed into such a closed system, then you have to add airflow to get it started, and even then the energy translation from airflow to fan and back wouldn't be 100% efficient, so over time your system would lose energy causing it to fail. (And that's a generous explanation, considering it wouldn't even run long enough to see that happen.)

Aircraft aren't just reliant upon propellers pulling a volume of air through to generate momentum, they also require overall flow to generate lift through aerodynamics, placing a couple of closed system propellers on an aircraft would just result in an expensive show of not understanding simple physics laws and how they are applied.
Click to expand...

Unfortunately, Victor doesn't have the *slightest* idea about how ANYTHING works. Unless and until something totally drastic and unlikely happens, he's doomed to spend the rest of his life trying to invent things that *cannot* possibly work. (Sigh)
 
Victor, this would be a great project for you to make a scale model.
Twin elastic-band-driven propellers on a balsa wood plane.

[video=youtube;Om5MF0ZbujE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Om5MF0ZbujE[/video]
Veegcorde
 
Last edited:
Stryder said:
Victor,
Are you trying to generate a perpetual motion system using a fan driven by it's own exhaust? If so then I'm sorry to say but you will fail, It won't work, it will never work.

If a fan is placed into such a closed system, then you have to add airflow to get it started, and even then the energy translation from airflow to fan and back wouldn't be 100% efficient, so over time your system would lose energy causing it to fail. (And that's a generous explanation, considering it wouldn't even run long enough to see that happen.)

Aircraft aren't just reliant upon propellers pulling a volume of air through to generate momentum, they also require overall flow to generate lift through aerodynamics, placing a couple of closed system propellers on an aircraft would just result in an expensive show of not understanding simple physics laws and how they are applied.
Click to expand...

Why it won't work?

Already checked, than air you can divert and the force of the air does not "touch" to the box.

This allows the air to move without stop the plane backwards.

You can do this deflecting the air with atmospheric pressure:

higs-pressure.jpg


no-touch-3-circles-2.jpg


Very affectionately,
Victor Elias Espinoza Guedez
06 February 2014
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top