A formation of strange objects filmed over India. Dino-vultures imo phosphorescing and doing birdy things like claiming territory etc. What do you think?
UFO Lights Filmed Descending Into Woods In India
- Thread starter common_sense_seeker
- Start date
NO! Not E.T's, why would they show themselves and teleport around the foothills of India for? It's flying cryptids you donuts, responsible for the cattle mutilations and very dangerous. The aliens are the good guys and are waiting for us to figure out the conundrum before they can make contact.
Don't you mean it's flying donuts you cryptid?
Seriously some shakey video from in the boonies of India really doesn't equate to evidence of anything other than sensationalism. The posed "teleportation" looks no different than the firing of a flare which doesn't light up until it reaches a set distance away from where it's being fired, of course you've heard that rationale before so it's obviously to obvious to be reality right?
The closest is the ropen of Papua New Guinea, although this is reported to be featherless. The feathered variety is typical of the Owlman of Cornwall (near where I live btw). Incidentally, I think they mainly eat fish or cuttlefish etc from the ocean but supplement from livestock, digesting the tongue and other nutritious soft parts. The anal bore holes would be due the desire to locate the urine intact within the bladder imo, which has a high concentration of phosphorous compounds Dartmoor sheep mutilation photos (notice the green slurry of the intestines infront of the rear legs).
Stryder: a skeptic can call the chinese lantern, flare or fake footage all day long, but if one investigates all the cases, like Nick Pope for example, then a pattern emerges that there is genuinely something strange going on.
Blurry out of focus footage with too much camera shake, and it's probably just flares.
Nick Pope is a liar.
Nick Pope is a shithead.
Are you trying to imply that Pope investigated ALL the cases?
Are you trying to imply that Pope INVESTIGATED all the cases?
Pope is a fantasist.
He was the sole officer for cataloguing incoming UFO reports for the MoD you donuts and it was his job to evaluate any possible security threats to UK airspace. The level of direct threat was deemed very low by the powers-that-be and his position was terminated as surplus to requirements. Nick Pope himself knew that a small percentage of the hundreds of reports were a genuine mystery which required further investigation. His superior officers appeared to disagree.
Correct.
Except that what he often neglects to mention is that that part of his job was throwaway, an add-on to his actual job for the MoD. As in "well somebody has to do it so we'll farm it out to the office boy".
http://www.uk-ufo.org/cosford/modpage.html
He resigned.
Again you're conflating "not having an (ordinary) explanation" with "it must be a real UFO".
And you missed my points completely.
1) Pope only had the opportunity to investigate the cases that were actually reported to the MoD.
2) Pope didn't have the time or the manpower to do thorough investigations - this would lead to lack of data and the conclusion I alluded to above. For example this site gives some insight as to the, ah, professionalism of Pope's "investigations".
http://www.uk-ufo.org/cosford/modpage.html
What's a TV? 
Which documentary?
And why would I want to watch something aimed at the 5-second-attention-span viewer?
I have never yet come across a TV documentary that gives the full facts, or even, in most cases, the actual facts.
Even when I did own a TV I looked upon "documentaries" as "possible starting points" (much like Wiki) rather than sources of information.
Having seen so many in my youth that catered for my field of expertise that were so badly flawed I tend to regard ALL as (potentially) equally flawed and view them with suspicion and healthy pinch of salt.
Which documentary?
And why would I want to watch something aimed at the 5-second-attention-span viewer?
I have never yet come across a TV documentary that gives the full facts, or even, in most cases, the actual facts.
Even when I did own a TV I looked upon "documentaries" as "possible starting points" (much like Wiki) rather than sources of information.
Having seen so many in my youth that catered for my field of expertise that were so badly flawed I tend to regard ALL as (potentially) equally flawed and view them with suspicion and healthy pinch of salt.
Odd that Pope only got Radar data from Fylingdales, and not DRA Malvern, RAF Digby, or RAF Menwith Hill.
Also the disclaimer about local Radar was odd, given the alleged sighting from two different Airforce bases.
Ah, but then Pope is a shithead.
The perpetrators of that hoax owned up. Mentioning it does nothing for your credibility.
Let's be honest, we are surveillance central. You'd have thought if there was something to see, we'd see it.