how can any one help you with that?
Victim of a crime does not always have evidence for legitimate accusations..So how can you claim people are being locked up under false accusations of insanity when you admit you have no evidence? Why are you making claims you admit you have no evidence for? You complain people who support SRT have no evidence and are frauds yet when you make claims for which you have no evidence it is okay?Yes.
Necessary to carry out an investigation to obtain evidence.
And you expect people to take you seriously?
I can to suspect only (not without reason).So how did you come to think some people who deny relativity have been locked up in hospitals and declared insane?I do not have possibilities and do not have the legal rights to conduct for such an investigation.
Through this forum started Liangzao FAN's experiments.and how do you think sciforums is going to help you acheive that?
I am confident that the OPERA-experiment group has been destroyed by similar to it dastardly method.
Through this forum started Liangzao FAN's experiments.
I have many thanks to the creators of this forum for it.
My many thanks to forum creators!
Time is absolute.You were also confident that Minkowski's equation $$(ct')^{2} \,-\, x'^{2} \,=\, (ct)^{2} \,-\, x^{2}$$ was "a lie". You were so confident that you refused to listen to anyone tell you otherwise for the first 15 pages of this thread. That is how long it took to explain a trivial equation to you.
So maybe you should consider questioning the basis of your confidence.
James R is Scientific, in contrast to SRT-lobbists, which in scientific polemics have not scientific potency for well-reasoned oppose.I wonder if you are aware that probably this forum's most visible administrator - James R - is a physicist. I believe he has the power to delete posts and even entire threads. He could delete any public evidence you had ever been here if he wished, and I doubt many people would complain if he did. Yet he has taken no action against you.
So indeed you may thank a physicist - and one who frequently defends SRT here no less - for allowing your thread to exist on this forum.
Accelerator Energy Electron Final Beta
MeV
0.025 0.313
0.035 0.369
0.045 0.412
0.055 0.449
0.065 0.480
I look forward repetitive experiments that will be proved (or - refuted) that the temperature of lead continues to grow in proportion to the potential difference of the accelerating field, while the electron velocity does not change.Fan's write-up (section 2.1 of http://h-theory.narod.ru/3LiangzaoFAN.pdf) actually favors Relativity over Newtonian theory or Fan's "Galilean" dynamics...
You have no evidence there are any such victims of some group trying to suppress SRT. There must be some reason to think it's about suppressing evidence against SRT. If you have absolutely zero then you've just made it up.Victim of a crime does not always have evidence for legitimate accusations..
But this can not be a reason to gag the victim.
So you made it up, plain and simple. You have an axe to grind so you made up lies to try to convince yourself and perhaps others. I'm not terribly fond of you but if I were to go around saying "Masterov is a murderer" you'd complain there's no evidence at all, that I'm just making up false stories because I don't like you. That's precisely what you're doing about all of this. You don't like SRT so you made up lies about people who support SRT in the hopes of turning others against them!I can to suspect only (not without reason).
Your 'theory' is nonsense, przyk has already been through that. As for experiments, Rpenner just handled that. You've also shown you don't know about experiments which have already been done which address some of your whining and you've also shown you don't know what SRT actually says in many instances.I have provided both theoretical and experimental evidence.
I'm a moderator here and I have a quantum field theory and general relativity background. People complain about you to the moderators because you're dishonest, ignoring information put right in front of you. People get tired of that.James R is Scientific, in contrast to SRT-lobbists, which in scientific polemics have not scientific potency for well-reasoned oppose.
SRT-lobbists to do provocations to opponents and to post complaints to moderator.
It's not new for me.
(Russian SRT-lobbists to behave meanly too.)
A thief should not complain that he was robbed.So you made it up, plain and simple. You have an axe to grind so you made up lies to try to convince yourself and perhaps others. I'm not terribly fond of you but if I were to go around saying "Masterov is a murderer" you'd complain there's no evidence at all, that I'm just making up false stories because I don't like you. That's precisely what you're doing about all of this. You don't like SRT so you made up lies about people who support SRT in the hopes of turning others against them!
James R is Scientific, in contrast to SRT-lobbists, which in scientific polemics have not scientific potency for well-reasoned oppose.
SRT-lobbists to do provocations to opponents and to post complaints to moderator.
(Russian SRT-lobbists to behave meanly too.)
I did not do it.You have accused virtually the whole physics research community...
I look forward repetitive experiments that will be proved (or - refuted) that the temperature of lead continues to grow in proportion to the potential difference of the accelerating field, while the electron velocity does not change.
Moderators of this forum do not lobby SRT.
AlphaNumeric and you are doing it.
Since Fan's paper didn't measure the current (or number of electrons) striking the target it presents no experimental results that need to be refuted. Bertozzi's experimental design and reporting of his experiment procedure are much better than Fan's -- consequently his results are given more weight. Moreover, Bertozzi's experiment continued to a range of energies where $$\beta$$ was approximately constant while Fan failed to do so.I look forward repetitive experiments that will be proved (or - refuted) that the temperature of lead continues to grow in proportion to the potential difference of the accelerating field, while the electron velocity does not change.
But this is not the speed reported in the table, which is dimensionless. Also, are we supposed to believe that Fan actually measured the times of the entry time and exit time or just the elapsed time? If he measured the elasped time, how did he calibrate his equipment so we would have confidence in his ability to measure elasped times to a precision of roughly one part per thousand?The front of electrons emited from a Linac continues its linear and uniform motion through a straight tube with length of S = 1.43[m]. Sensors were installed at both ends of a section of the tube to measure the entry
time $$t_1$$ and the exit time $$t_2$$ of the electronic front into and out of the section. The speed gained by electrons due to the Linac’s acceleration was calculated as $$V = \frac{S}{t_2 - t_1}$$.
If that were not true, then the results of it direct experiment to world public, because it would confirm the SRT.If that were true, one would think you should be very interested in the decades of results collected from particle accelerators that generally support relativity extremely well. Instead, you act like you want the experimental slate wiped clean.I look forward repetitive experiments that will be proved (or - refuted) that the temperature of lead continues to grow in proportion to the potential difference of the accelerating field, while the electron velocity does not change.
I do not follow the processes of science, but even a cursory glance is enough to see the evidence:you are calling physicists "criminals" and accusing them of "lobbying" without evidence