I do not see a problem?
So, prove your equations anyway you can.
Otherwise, you are wrong.
I do not see a problem?
I do not denying reality.Except it does, since the network works when it includes the GR corrections. You're now denying reality!It can not be explained by relativism.
You have a very low level of qualification.Otherwise, you are wrong.I do not see a problem?
So, prove your equations anyway you can.
Some clocks was fast, and others - looses.
Some clocks was fast, and others - looses.
It can not be explained by relativism.
Generally accepted premises?That is not a proof because that is not a reasoned argument from generally accepted premises.
False, because observers do not use the same concept of simultaneity in relativity.Time can not slow down.
Proof 1: If the observer sees a slowing of time of another observer, the second observer will see the acceleration of time of first observer.
Actually this has already been considered. There are no causality violations in relativity as long as nothing capable of carrying information travels faster than light.If both the observer sees time dilation from each other, then violated the principle of causality.
It is the verbal gymnastics.observers do not use the same concept of simultaneity in relativity
In it can be trusted only.There are no causality violations in relativity as long as nothing capable of carrying information travels faster than light.
Sorry to say Masterov, Przk is quite correct as far as I know...It is the verbal gymnastics.
It makes no sense.In it can be trusted only.
But it is impossible to understand.
1. If the observer sees a slowing of time of another observer, the second observer will see the acceleration of time of first observer (not violated the principle of causality).
2. If both the observers sees time dilation from each other, then NOT violated the principle of causality too?
These two options of one situation to do ambiguity, and therefore can not exist simultaneously.
I think you will find if you study the method of getting to the position of relative simultaneity you will find that the idea of two observers projecting on to a single screen is incorrect.Suppose that two observers are projecting movies on one screen.
If Przk right then on the screen there is an indefinite sequence of picture areas.
You have succeeded greatly in the ability to deceive ourselves.Each observer has his own screen.
Such paradoxes are a death sentence for any scientific theory unambiguously.I believe it is in actual fact a paradox
Obviously you never bothered to try to understand the theory you are criticising. Symmetrical time dilation follows directly from the Lorentz transformation:It is the verbal gymnastics.
It makes no sense.
Obviously you never bothered to try to understand the theory you are criticising. Symmetrical time dilation follows directly from the Lorentz transformation...
Look Lorentz's error, post 219, page 11 of this thema.Regarding causality, it's easy enough to show from...