Um, no.They dont lie. They only share what they learned.
They didn't "learn" anything. They made up a story and made claims.
And then expanded on that and added further lies.
Um, no.They dont lie. They only share what they learned.
Um, no.
They didn't "learn" anything. They made up a story and made claims.
And then expanded on that and added further lies.
One more time: they made it up.They really learn alot, the stories and claims are the result of their understanding and not forced to anybody.
One more time: they made it up.
Their "understanding" is limited, they invent fantasies, tell lies and generally talk bollocks.
There is not one shred of supporting evidence for their nonsense and numerous instances of evidence that directly contradicts them.
Then you are either as ignorant or as deluded as they are.I belive they are wise.
No, but I've seen some of his "science".Have you tried Dr. Tom J. Chalko's books.
His "science" isn't.They are very valid.
I doubt it, from what I've seen of his lies and delusions.I never met this person but his ideas are correct.
Then you are either as ignorant or as deluded as they are.
No, but I've seen some of his "science".
His "science" isn't.
I doubt it, from what I've seen of his lies and delusions.
You don't get it at all do you?I wont agrue with it, again that is what you want to believe.
You don't get it at all do you?
It's not a question of "belief" on my part.
The book makes claims it doesn't support.
The book makes claims it can't support.
The makes claims that directly contradict reality.
The book is a fantasy. With ZERO foundation in fact or reality.
It is a tissue of lies, fantasy and misrepresentation.
This is not a "belief" on my part, it is (and has been partly in this thread) demonstrated as such.
As have Chalko's lies/ fantasies/ misrepresentation.
All you have have done so far (much like the book) is make repeated statements of belief without offering one single shred of support.
Why is it valid? The book or your opinion?Like I said Im only expressing my opinion. It is valid and worth exploring
Why is it valid? The book or your opinion?
Because you choose to believe lies? (If you mean your opinion).
And if you mean the book, IT IS NOT valid.
Why is it worth exploring? (Again).
I'm done with you.
Don't forget to leave your name on the gullible crank register on the way out... I have a few friends with bridges for sale.
Then you lack understanding. In fact you appear to abjure understanding altogether, in favour of unquestioning belief. Welcome to droid-hood and your very own box...Why is it valid. .. because I understand it is valid
See post #331.Worth exploring .. because its about humanity
Then you lack understanding. In fact you appear to abjure understanding altogether, in favour of unquestioning belief. Welcome to droid-hood and your very own box...
See post #331.
Yep. That's part of your delusion.Im not in a box, like I said before, I explore every possibilities
Yep. That's part of your delusion.
Thinking you're "exploring possibilities" while blindly accepting lies and fantasy as "valid".
In every cry of every man,
In every infant's cry of fear,
In every voice, in every ban,
The mind-forged manacles I hear
Wm. Blake London.
Your shackles are holding up nicely.
And so far you've done absolutely nothing to discredit that view.For most people, it looks like "blindly accepting lies and fantasy".
And so far you've done absolutely nothing to discredit that view.
Um, again: no.Again, That is what you want to believe.
I got as far as the title.Make sure you watch it from end to end.. o.k?..I know you will...
I got as far as the title.
I'm not wasting bandwidth and my limited download allowance on crap like that.