I think you hate the fact I am well-informed in the UFO phenomenon. You won't find someone like me in a hurry which can debate the intricate subjects. I know the UFO history like the back of my hand. My rational opinion on the subject is what has led me to know there is more than what the story is being told by the skeptics.
The Washington National Airport Sightings
- Thread starter Reiku
- Start date
I don't bother "implying" anything, Bub, I tell it straight up just like is. Unlike you nutters who RELY on implications.
Wanna know something? I've got no problem to get over. You are the one with a problem because I fully intend to highlight ANY AND ALL mistakes the you make here simply because I think you are UFO nutty!
And by the way, why did you make up that stupid word "confusement"? Is the ordinary word "confusion" to difficult for you to spell????
And you want everyone to believe your previous statement that you have no informed opinions on UFO believers???
GIVE ME A BREAK lol
You and others don't go around calling believers cranks and nuts for no good reason. You may as well attack their education on baseless grounds.
In the meanwhile, I haven't seen any credible scientific explanation from yourself or no-one for that matter on the Washington 1952 incident.
I'll assume this one has you all stumped. Just what I like to see
@Mister --
No what some people have is a life, a job. I'm a freelance writer, if I don't produce quality work in a timely manner then the money goes elsewhere, I'm sorry if that inconveniences you but I don't have time to just sit here all day keeping track of the threads, that's what the moderators are for(and they have lives and jobs too).
I don't remember seeing the post, but given as it was undoubtedly in response to one of your more "out there" statements(and there are a plethora to choose from), I fail to see how it was my responsibility to correct Ophiliote. Perhaps you should have corrected the post yourself by telling us your qualifications.
And honestly, offending someone here is not a violation of the rules or anything. Was what he posted true? I haven't the foggiest, but I fail to see why I should care.
I can see how you would think that, but given my ignorance of the post I have to wonder why you would. One explanation is that it fits with your worldview of a global conspiracy to hide "the truth" and it fits with the psychology needed to maintain such a worldview, but now I'm just speculating and since that's your forte I'll leave that to you.
Again, some of us have lives outside of this forum.
No what some people have is a life, a job. I'm a freelance writer, if I don't produce quality work in a timely manner then the money goes elsewhere, I'm sorry if that inconveniences you but I don't have time to just sit here all day keeping track of the threads, that's what the moderators are for(and they have lives and jobs too).
I don't remember seeing the post, but given as it was undoubtedly in response to one of your more "out there" statements(and there are a plethora to choose from), I fail to see how it was my responsibility to correct Ophiliote. Perhaps you should have corrected the post yourself by telling us your qualifications.
And honestly, offending someone here is not a violation of the rules or anything. Was what he posted true? I haven't the foggiest, but I fail to see why I should care.
I can see how you would think that, but given my ignorance of the post I have to wonder why you would. One explanation is that it fits with your worldview of a global conspiracy to hide "the truth" and it fits with the psychology needed to maintain such a worldview, but now I'm just speculating and since that's your forte I'll leave that to you.
Again, some of us have lives outside of this forum.
And you want everyone to believe your previous statement that you have no informed opinions on UFO believers???
GIVE ME A BREAK lol
You and others don't go around calling believers cranks and nuts for no good reason. You may as well attack their education on baseless grounds.
In the meanwhile, I haven't seen any credible scientific explanation from yourself or no-one for that matter on the Washington 1952 incident.
I'll assume this one has you all stumped. Just what I like to see
I'm not even the least bit interested in that Washington "incident" or any others.
My purpose here is very simple and straightforward - to emphasize your missteps, pointing out when you trip over your own two clumsy feet, etc. And anyone who resorts to making up silly words like "confusement" has no place among literate and intelligent people. And there is nothing you can do to prevent me from doing so. My ultimate goal is to never relent until you finally give up is disgust/distaste and leave this site forever. You can take your nonsense and try to peddle it elswhere.
I'm afraid you will fail in presenting any missteps of mine if you aren't willing to debate the incidents at hand. Because if you have no willingness to debate the OP, then I will report you for trolling.
Simples. Debate the thread, or cease communicating in it.
Oh, and if anyone else here thinks I can be bullied into leaving this site, you can think again. My ability to see things through right to the end are renown.
ReadOnly, grow up. I mean seriously, how old are you? I will never leave this site forever, especially for the likes of you. If anything, you drive me to want to stay. the complete opposite of your goal lol
ReadOnly, grow up. I mean seriously, how old are you? I will never leave this site forever, especially for the likes of you. If anything, you drive me to want to stay. the complete opposite of your goal lol
Did you read the comments about the video? That colour TV was not broadcast in the USA in 1952? Did you check up those facts independently?
Also, that colour film was very expensive at that time, and therefore, it is unlikely a camera with colour film was just filming the sky at that time.
Also no source or credit is given for the clip, so no further investigation may take place.
These little things go over your head, huh?
I'm betting my KIDS are older than you (and more intelligent as well as better educated, too).
Oh, you'll give it someday - I've NO doubt about that. And as far as debating your topic? I've seen all of this garbage before. In fact, ones like the Washington "incident", I was aware of it when it happened, which, I figure was LONG before you were even born. It was trash then and it's still trash today.
And by the way, your color film is TOTALLY bogus!! You obviously aren't aware of it's history. :bugeye: Yes, a sad, sad person you are!
Who cares? We don't live in your silly neighborhood!
And the proper English form of what you TRIED to say above would include an "s" at the end of your rather illiterate "cause." :bugeye:Oh how brilliant for your kids.
Do your kids realize they have a overbearing, pompous and undignified Father?
If they do and are as intelligent as you claim, I doubt they be much pleased.
Where did you hear that? More claims, no more evidence.
Well, you are going to be lonely over there in formal debates, 'cos your BS vid was already debunked over at YouTube. You haven't added any proof, so it remains debunked.
Who cares about the video anyway? I posted about the incident before I even went on youtube to search for a video evidence.
With any video evidence, fake or not aside, the history is there in black and white. Saying the sightings are rubbish based on a fake video is unscientific and blind to the hard facts.
With any video evidence, fake or not aside, the history is there in black and white. Saying the sightings are rubbish based on a fake video is unscientific and blind to the hard facts.