I get it. You spoke imprecisely. That was my point. It's a habit with you. It's one reason your views are rarely treated with respect.
But I am right . Each county in any state has its own voting rules .
My views or responses .
I get it. You spoke imprecisely. That was my point. It's a habit with you. It's one reason your views are rarely treated with respect.
Your responses are ambiguous, which casts serious doubts on your views.My views or responses .
Your responses are ambiguous, which casts serious doubts on your views.
You can listen to your own convictions, or you can listen to external input. Readers decide the quality of writing, not the author.At first , perhaps , but in time the ambiguity diminishes .
You can listen to your own convictions, or you can listen to external input. Readers decide the quality of writing, not the author.
Now that is intelligible, but is only relevant to the thread if the objective of the thread is to declare, "Oh, look at me. I'm River. I'm really smart and have great ideas and phenomenal insight."The More Readers , the better .
Now that is intelligible, but is only relevant to the thread if the objective of the thread is to declare, "Oh, look at me. I'm River. I'm really smart and have great ideas and phenomenal insight."
So frigging what? Once again, totally irrelevant.I Read Books , Watch Intelligent programs , on TV .
The More Readers , the better .
Now that is intelligible, but is only relevant to the thread if the objective of the thread is to declare, "Oh, look at me. I'm River. I'm really smart and have great ideas and phenomenal insight."
Here, in this thread. Why else talk about reading books? Why take multiple posts to (apparently) accept that your posts were unintelligble? Why declare "The More Readers the Better", seemingly seeing this as evidence of how attractive your writing is?Look I have known me for a long time . My Attitude Towards Understanding of Anything is , What do you think and Why . Discussion .
Where have I made an EGO based , I'm Superior to everyone post ? Give me the post# and thread , and where this thread is in .
Here, in this thread. Why else talk about reading books? Why take multiple posts to (apparently) accept that your posts were unintelligble? Why declare "The More Readers the Better", seemingly seeing this as evidence of how attractive your writing is?
And, in just about every other thread of yours I can think of.
And you really don't see that talking about yourself reading books, out of the blue, no contact to the foregoing, you don't see that such is an expression of your ego? You have an even larger problem than I imagined.Highlighted
Because of its Importance . A Truth no matter who said it .
that is intelligible, but is only relevant to the thread if the objective of the thread is to declare, "Oh, look at me. I'm River. I'm really smart and have great ideas and phenomenal insight."
I Read Books , Watch Intelligent programs , on TV .
No man. Get real. There was no encouragement there. Out of the blue, with no relationship to what had gone before, you suddenly said "I Read Books". You did not encourage others to do so, you did not suggest that they do so, and even if you had it is not apparent how that could relate to what went before.
Not exactly. County officials carry a lot of the responsibility, but must all comply with state regulations. States must comply with HAVA standards.But I am right . Each county in any state has its own voting rules .
.
Not exactly. County officials carry a lot of the responsibility, but must all comply with state regulations.
If you were thinking of states, there are only 50, not 85,000 - that's a serious discrepancy.State regulations differ from state to state , then .
If you were thinking of states, there are only 50, not 85,000 - that's a serious discrepancy.
To some extent, yes, states do have their own regulations. We knew that already.
We also know that who can tamper (insert BS, or whatever) is tightly controlled. Not Anyone can; just the officials, and the overwhelming majority, if not all, or them are so honest and conscientious I'm sure it must hurt. The integrity of the system is not in any danger from the polling stations or the tabulating officials, the postal service or the volunteer counters. It's in danger from the Republican party, the deeply invested financial supporters, the state-level politicians who want their backs scratched by their federal counterparts, the entrenched party system itself, the concentration of power, economic disparity, divisive political strategies, the electoral college and the deeply flawed principle of winner-take-all.