ROTFLMAO!
The point is perspective or the notion of what is "acceptable" evidence. In one case we have an accepted explanation accompanied by what is perceived as credible proof. We can't duplicate that explanation. We have as many questions to this very day concerning the reality of the proposed explanation's process as we do hard facts to support it's premise. But because it's considered an empirical "scientific explanation" we disregard the missing bits that we don't understand and tie it all together with something I have always contended was a parallel to religious faith.
The thing with UFOs is that in all our commonly understood and accepted scientific knowledge of space and dimensional reality, we don't have a clue how they "work". All we can do is observe them ignorantly, and yet undeniably. Then in some vainly proud & embittered furry demand "hard evidence" or we won't be swayed by any such nonsense.
It all boils down to our scientific habits and our ever present human ego. If we can't attach a logical explanation to the irrefutable film and video based evidence, one that juxtaposes itself against our undeniable superiority in the vast scheme of things, we'll just chalk it all up to wackos and attention grabbers. Right?
I for one of many do not buy it for a second. The truth is that there has been a great deal of credible research done on the history of the social impact of UFOs. That impact is readily visible throughout the last several thousand years of recorded history and no I am not talking Chariots of The Gods BS here.
I just find the whole perspective of science concerning UFOs extremely hypocritical. The standoffish nature of the scientific communities rebuttal reeks of egotism via a distinct possibility that man can simply not come to terms with the fact that he is truly not the superior intelligence involved in the big picture. "Oh yes, there is no question that the possibility of other life in the universe is very real. Quit probable actually. I sincerely doubt however that such life has evolved to a stance superior to our own"
What kind of a narrow minded, inferiority complexes poster child of a perspective is that?
It's just more ego driven scientific faith based bullshit.
It's time we quit getting back to the proverbial logic based drawing board and start admitting that we require a different route if we are ever going to TRULY evolve to a potential level of understanding concerning these "silly" matters.
I am sure that this will be greeted with the usual "warm and fuzzy" anecdotal scientific communities satire. Thing is, it's the very nature of this type of impulsive dismissal that has kept mankind locked in it's comfortable ego subservient "silly" stone age closet for so long.
