An interesting enough post, but there are a few issues and errors I would like to point out:
You didn't see it with your own eyes or hear it with your own ears - and you are fully dependant upon the testimony of the person that wrote that specific chapter, (to which you can only make assumptions as to who). It's like me saying I saw Frodo throw the ring in the fires of mount doom with my own eyes.
But this does not hold true with the OT, where god takes physical form many times. One such example would be in the GofE where he takes a nice stroll, or when he dances in front of moses.
Strange perhaps that the religious jews have sex between sheets, unable to look upon each other, (Fundie English jews at any rate). Also not for fun, but only to conceive, (from the case of the man killed by god for spilling his sperm). It's inaccurate to then state it's about "pleasure", when it isn't.
The Revelation at Mount Sinai, which we saw with our own eyes and heard with our own ears, not dependent on the testimony of others..
You didn't see it with your own eyes or hear it with your own ears - and you are fully dependant upon the testimony of the person that wrote that specific chapter, (to which you can only make assumptions as to who). It's like me saying I saw Frodo throw the ring in the fires of mount doom with my own eyes.
Maimonides devotes most of the "Guide for the Perplexed" to the fundamental idea that God is incorporeal, meaning that He assumes no physical form.
But this does not hold true with the OT, where god takes physical form many times. One such example would be in the GofE where he takes a nice stroll, or when he dances in front of moses.
Sex in the proper context is one of the holiest acts we can perform.
Strange perhaps that the religious jews have sex between sheets, unable to look upon each other, (Fundie English jews at any rate). Also not for fun, but only to conceive, (from the case of the man killed by god for spilling his sperm). It's inaccurate to then state it's about "pleasure", when it isn't.