You say anyone who believe in god is conceited yet you don't say why.
You say that anyone who believes in god actually doesn't believe in god because they love themself too much yet you don't say why.
You say such a person is like hitler but you don't say why.
I do say why. They love themselves too much because they actually believe that God cares enough to answer their prayers or give a fucking shit about them. And of course, that's emotional. Everything's emotional. Emotions make power. And if you read between the lines, you'll see how that's related to Hilter. Hitler loved himself so much that he thought God was favoring his actions, that killing Jews was what God wanted. That's as extreme as it could get. Plus, I used the same syntax you used in your argument about atheists to add a little more pun and fun. It was fun, but I guess you don't get humor that much, do you?
In otherwords the essence of your post is that theists are conceited, love themselves too much and are fascists, all with an absence of argument- that's not emmotional?
Yep. It's emotional. But so is everything else. It's emotion based on the reason that God doesn't really give a shit about you at all, but you're conceited for thinking that he does.
your recent thread about religion being hairy balls is a good example of something that should not be taken seriously though - why - because its 100% emmotional and lacks any serious compilation of evidence
No evidence? I gave you the evidence of the Crusades, Manifest Desitiny, War in Iraq, Lebanon election crisis, Hitler, Mohammad, Saudi Arabia, Thirty Years' War, etc...
What more do you want?
Oh, you want me to be detailed, is that it? What, you can't read secondary sources on your own? You want me to summarize everything for you because you're too lazy to look up great sources and enlighten your religiously narrow mind? Look, I gave you some examples, it's up to you to investigate those exmplaes and see how right or wrong I am.
Besides, this is an Internet forum, not a place to write theses and nonfiction books. It's just to get you to think about it a little bit so you can find more about it.
When religious people ask me to look it up. I do. I've read the entire bible (mainly because my dad is a pastor). I know what's up. I read half of the Koran. I read the Teachings of Buddha (the translated version). I read historical texts (check out Lies My Teacher Told Me and Crisis of Islam). People tell me that I have to read in original language or whatever. So I refer to some people who can speak Greek or Hebrew or Latin and talk to them.
I'm not supposed to give you every detailed evidence there is, not on an Internet forum, when I have so much fucking stuff to do for my college course anyway.
If you want to stay closeminded and just choose not to believe in anything I say without giving any thought to any other sources or any of the evidence I have already stated, fine. Be that. Stay in your parochial school of thought. Stay with your religion and do whatever your religion has always taught you to do and continue telling others about your awesome religion. IT's your life, it's your choice.
Instead of looking down at me for not providing a GOOD compilation of evidence, how about you actually counter my arguments with evidence of your own, instead of trying to put me down all the time? You don't win debates with personal attacks. Actually, debates like this are unwinnable. But at least, it'd be good if you provide your own examples once in a while.
Oh, and one last thing. Korean language has augmented new English words and new Chinese words but those were additions and it's still pure as it was 1000 years ago. The only difference between the dominantly English country and Korea is that Korea simply has more bilinguals and trilinguals like me.
