but I pray to you do not let the word of atheism spread.
http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=2811253&postcount=150I would label you as an open-minded atheist. Yeah? To me that is very good place to be in this day of age.
Just keep an open mind, and when you meet your maker understand his word goes period.
This opinion would be based on your personal delusion, right?Being atheist is better than being a blinded Christian, imo.
Rife with too many suppositions.and when you meet your maker understand his word goes period.
Oops, error. Maybe you don't know what "atheism" means.However, when you start to tell others God does not exist you become part of the problem.
False. This is equivalent to saying "if other people think 2+2=5, keep quiet and let them carry on". (From either perspective).If you want to be atheist, fine, keep it yourself. If you are Christian fine, but keep it to yourself.
This opinion would be based on your personal delusion, right?
Rife with too many suppositions.
Oops, error. Maybe you don't know what "atheism" means.
False. This is equivalent to saying "if other people think 2+2=5, keep quiet and let them carry on". (From either perspective).
Ridiculous. You can't have evidence of something not existing (which isn't a claim I've made anyway).You have no evidence God does not exist
But you don't have evidence that god exists.I have evidence 2 + 2 does not = 5.
Wrong on both counts.Terrible analogy. You make assumptions, just as you accuse me of.
@Dywyddyr --
Actually we do have some evidence that certain god/s don't exist in that lack of evidence. If evidence is supposed to be there, like the power of intercessory prayer most monotheists assert, isn't there in the final analysis, then it is evidence that god is absent. Sometimes an absence of evidence is indeed evidence of absence.
I agree, but as a general principle...@Dywyddyr --
Actually we do have some evidence that certain god/s don't exist in that lack of evidence. If evidence is supposed to be there, like the power of intercessory prayer most monotheists assert, isn't there in the final analysis, then it is evidence that god is absent. Sometimes an absence of evidence is indeed evidence of absence.
I note you don't stick to your own advice.If you don't want to believe, FINE, but keep it to yourself.
I agree, but as a general principle...
I note you don't stick to your own advice.
And why should we keep it to ourselves?
Other than because YOU say so?
PS it's not a question of not "wanting" to believe. Another error on your part.
You have no idea what I am talking about.
Yet you're telling everyone else with an opinion (or belief) to keep it themselves. Hypocrisy is great, isn't it?WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT. I am trying to spread the word of God.
Ooh, blatantly erroneous. If I believe you and take YOUR word then I'm losing out on the chance of finding the genuine religion/ path to god.No bad can come from that
Skewing your words?except people like you skewing my words to create clashing ideologies on the same topic (the Creator).
There is no evidence of God.
If you don't want to believe, FINE, but keep it to yourself.
...except people like you skewing my words to create clashing ideologies on the same topic (the Creator).
Yet you're telling everyone else with an opinion (or belief) to keep it themselves. Hypocrisy is great, isn't it?
Ooh, blatantly erroneous. If I believe you and take YOUR word then I'm losing out on the chance of finding the genuine religion/ path to god.
I mean, there's no guarantee, and no evidence, that you're any more correct than any other nutter with delusions of correctness, is there?
Skewing your words?
On the contrary, all I'm doing is pointing out the inconsistencies in your (unsupported) declarations.
@Knowledge --
Then there's no reason for anyone to believe.
Ah the old(and it's very old) "you atheists should just bend over and take it quietly like a good little bitch" line.
Yeah, sorry but we've been doing that since the dawn of history, and it didn't work out too well(thousands of religious wars, uncountable religious confrontation, unbelievers and uppity people being burned alive, et cetera, et cetera). You lot have had about ten thousand years with the megaphone, and the reigns of power, I think that it's time you got used to us speaking our minds.
Keep in mind that we're still new to this. This is the first century where we've really had the freedom to speak out about what we believe and what we don't and why we don't accept religious claims without being killed. Hell, in much of the world this still isn't the case, for many atheists it's only the ambiguity of the internet that keeps them safe from harm. Even in the US there are areas where we can't be open about who we aren't. I have personally been run out of a town at gunpoint because I didn't believe, and there are still seven states where it is illegal to hold any public office if you do not believe in one supreme being(so goodbye polytheists as well).
Knowing all of this, do you still think that we should just shut up?
I've not seen one person deliberately skew your words or twist your meanings. If it has happened it's because you communicated them poorly and then the onus is on you to correct that. I know that all I, and others in this thread, have done is to turn your logic back against you. We altered nothing about your message, just showed you the logical fallacies.
Incorrect:Im consistent, as are you. Be a good man that is all.
The hypocrisy runs deep in this one...You can pray for other people, but not in place of them. Religion IS NOT OF God. There is no evidence of God. If you don't want to believe, FINE, but keep it to yourself.