The gig truly IS up. LOL.
Do you? No
Therefore you are assigning persons roles in a state of delusion woo woo
Can you prove who your biological parents are?
No
In stead you simply make a claim of belief
Two videos for you my friend...The gig truly IS up. LOL.
Two videos for you my friend...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sr5lY0TcdAw&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppIgFEFUpjw&feature=related
universaldistress,
do you know that how and why are two different questions? how is "by what manner or way, or by what means", and why is "what is the cause, reason, or purpose". science answers "how" but it doesn't answer "why", and it never will. it's not supposed to. people use science in the same way they use anything, for bad or for good depending upon the intentions of those using it. it does not however, determine what is bad or good or why. it doesn't assign meaning to anything, so theoretically at least, you're dooming yourself to a meaningless existence, regardless of what you know. though i find it hard to believe you really do that.
universaldistress,
I think we are all built to search for and find truth. Truth exists, even if no one believes it. For example, a thousand years go, did anyone know about black holes in space? No. Because they didn't know, they didn't believe. Because they didn't believe, does that mean they didn't exist? No.
Faith does not provide knowledge.The study of how we "know" something is called epistemology. There are three basic ways in which we humans can "know" something:
1. Direct experience (Examples: touch it, feel it, see it, etc.).
2. Through logic. (Example: Lassie is a dog. All dogs are mortal. Therefore, Lassie is mortal.)
3. Through faith. (Example: My wife loves me. Can I prove that scientifically? No. But I KNOW she loves me, beyond a doubt.)
Then you really do not have anything to lose. You cannot desire what you do not know.Exactly. They didn't believe. So why do people believe in god then? Why not just wait for the existence of god to be discovered. that makes sense.
When proven the sane man believes.
Before proven the insane man believes.
Your statement doesn't aid your cause at all.
I do not say god doesn't exist. It is possible god could exist. That isn't the point though. Belief in a maybe is delusional, that is the point.
But..............what if.................. :wave:
"The heart has reasons that reason cannot know." Blaise PascalFaith does not provide knowledge.
In your example you do not know, you believe.
So what?"The heart has reasons that reason cannot know." Blaise Pascal
Exactly. They didn't believe. So why do people believe in god then? Why not just wait for the existence of god to be discovered. that makes sense.
When proven the sane man believes.
Before proven the insane man believes.
Your statement doesn't aid your cause at all.
I do not say god doesn't exist. It is possible god could exist. That isn't the point though. Belief in a maybe is delusional, that is the point.
Attack the poster, not the content. Typical ineffective point making.
The OP question is clear, and scientific.
I meant they are useless for the purposes of reaching any kind of certainty about which religion is the right one. Sure, the more time you spend with a person of faith the more likely you may be to become convinced that there's something to it, but there's something to a lot of things and we don't live long enough to spend the requisite amount of time with representatives of all the worlds many religions in order to determine which something there is more to.
Not addressing this song at you, just watch and listen - here.
There are two kinds of ad hominems / ad personams:
1. vicious attacks on the person,
2. addressing the person because their own qualifications or disqualifications are relevant to the topic that is being discussed.
It is the second kind of ad hominems / ad personams that are being directed here at you.