The gig is up.

audible said:
Perhaps you should dumb it down to a Sesame Street font.
For LG today Sesame Street comes to you with the letters...
16ibqqa.jpg

And give him this new name too.
And if he likes he can colour it in.
It's got to be easier for him to understand.
Click to expand...

I think you could be onto something :)
 
Picture this scenario. A patient comes to the doctor complaining about back pain. The doctor goes through all possible tests, but cannot see anything. Yet the back pain is real to the patient, even though the best technology cannot see it.

In the case of the back pain, we may not be able to see it from the outside, so we can satisfy the easiest level of proof. Proof will require climbing inside the other person's skin and experiencing what they experience to make sure this is not a trick. But this is beyond the state of the art.

We can't see this back pain from the outside, yet it appears to exist, without tangible proof, using the methods of science. Still the doctors, to be safe, may give the person pain killers, less technical limitations, result in the wrong diagnosis.
 
wellwisher said:
Picture this scenario. A patient comes to the doctor complaining about back pain. The doctor goes through all possible tests, but cannot see anything. Yet the back pain is real to the patient, even though the best technology cannot see it.

In the case of the back pain, we may not be able to see it from the outside, so we can satisfy the easiest level of proof. Proof will require climbing inside the other person's skin and experiencing what they experience to make sure this is not a trick. But this is beyond the state of the art.

We can't see this back pain from the outside, yet it appears to exist, without tangible proof, using the methods of science. Still the doctors, to be safe, may give the person pain killers, less technical limitations, result in the wrong diagnosis.
Click to expand...
Sorry you lost me, what is your point, because doctors know via years of evidence that people have back problems, that don't necessarily have a cause at first diagnosis. Enlighten me to what your trying to suggest, please!
 
audible said:
Sorry you lost me, what is your point, because doctors know via years of evidence that people have back problems, that don't necessarily have a cause at first diagnosis. Enlighten me to what your trying to suggest, please!
Click to expand...

that there is only evidence and no proof..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top