That's my take anyway. better than zero take (I DON'T GET IIITTTTT!)
The gig is up.
- Thread starter universaldistress
- Start date
Is there a day-glow diagram with weird terms to go with this explanation, because I don't understand what you are saying
I just did explain the post that started this. For you I might add. As I first asked you what you didn't get in the one above.
I'll do the other one for you tomorrow.
Then you can stop moaning that you do not have enough knowledge/brain power to understand Sci.
You just compound your lack of brain power. LOL.
must be something about the day-glo colours that flood the cortex with divergent proxy bands, quelled by the gravitational florae pundulom retroflux lippid groutillettes where x is the vetrex maxistructure that require one to take a good night's rest I guess
you're the one who requires to sleep before they attempt to post something intelligible
:shrug:
You can't fit all three together. You're required to prove a valid belief system in the existence of god (self faith) to yourself without further proof to anybody else, in my opinion, as it would be valid to other persons. That belief system seems to be entirely correct, but further faith MAY thenafter lie in the hands of the faith that you have of him I guess.
DimLight can only read what glows in the dark.
Don't strain your brain on this one; it's just art.
You've have enough for one day on the four forces and gravity.
Maybe it's in the shape of a stick-figure person, but I'm not telling.
Maybe hold up a cross to it and exorcise it.
If you don't include a reason "why" you fail. But that was pretty topic oriented (Supposively).
God isn't provable in certain senses, yet in other senses- and in other ways of looking at it- entirely provable. That would be a positive conversation- and a worthwile representation. No
God has really absolutely no validity per say. He's a given, because he has created the universe before any perception that existed of him for him to exist. But trying to straighten my on topic represnetation up a little, I post this as a degredation to the previous post.
jamesbrentonk
God isn't provable in certain senses, yet in other senses- and in other ways of looking at it- entirely provable. That would be a positive conversation- and a worthwile representation. No
God has really absolutely no validity per say. He's a given, because he has created the universe before any perception that existed of him for him to exist. But trying to straighten my on topic represnetation up a little, I post this as a degredation to the previous post.
jamesbrentonk
"It means you don't!"
And I expect n ot to see another finger in the same direction.
And I expect n ot to see another finger in the same direction.
Btw that is an extrodinarially poor picture, depicting poetry on a thread about God. Shame on your quality.
And you, SciWriter, go around preaching about humility?
I used to wonder what you are doing here.
But now I see you are abundantly developing the 24th quality!
The gig is up
DimLight can only read what glows in the dark.
Don't strain your brain on this one; it's just art.
You've have enough for one day on the four forces and gravity.
Maybe it's in the shape of a stick-figure person, but I'm not telling.
Maybe hold up a cross to it and exorcise it.
If you want to continue to talk nonsense please find the suitable forum for it.
The quality, and darn it, the effort Sci puts into his art is respect worthy. If your posts were as high quality as the way most of the posters here scratch their noses (indeed their heads at your gibberish (not I might add because they are complex but because they a flippin nuttified)) then maybe you would garner more regard. Anywhere.
If you have issue then attack a point coherently.
Nothing to do with humility and you know it. Ideas don't have humility or pride. Discuss soundness or not of the ideas presented.
truth is simple.
I am just reflecting your own statements on the fact that you are making them.
Why should I not do that?
Why should it be taboo to apply the content of a person's statements to themselves?
Once again your incredulous and dishonest nature rears its ugly head, you reject everything without consideration.kind of fitting that you cite the authority of your deluded authority.... yada yada .... Jeez, you haven't even seen an electron have you, yet here you go blindly believing.... yada yada ... yrfullashit ..... yada yada
see how easy that is?
Just goes to show that the previous statement "your full of shit arsehole" was quite apt, you offer nothing to the conversation but vague statements and platitudes, which is why you are not worth the time or the energy.
Lol, pot kettle much
Perhaps you should dumb it down to a Sesame Street font.
For LG today Sesame Street comes to you with the letters...
And give him this new name too.
And if he likes he can colour it in.
It's got to be easier for him to understand.