The conference hall debate!

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm starting to doubt your inability to learn these things that are being explained to you over and over again.

I'm beginning to suspect you're just trolling, now.

Yes, clear light is white light because it has no obvious discernible colour.
The truth at last clear not white, ok so what value is this clear compared to sight?
 
Frequency is zero

Is it now? Well, that's interesting...

EMSpectrumcolor.jpg


That would be WELL below the Gamma-ray area... I don't believe we can see that mate...
 
Look at your computer screen , notice the rgb white background and observe the space between your eyes and the white it is clear.
That's because there's nothing obscuring your vision by absorbing the light before it reaches your eyes. The light is still there flowing between the computer screen and your face.
 
Is this clear seen as a constant to all sighted observers?
What does that even mean? "Clear" just means there's nothing blocking your view. The light is still there, it's WHAT YOU USE TO SEE STUFF WITH. If there wasn't any light, you'd be in total darkness regardless of anything blocking your view.
 
So light doesn't exist. But! Somehow it is a part of the universe.

Is this not the crux of your argument?
 
What does that even mean? "Clear" just means there's nothing blocking youconstzntsThe light is still there, it's WHAT YOU USE TO SEE STUFF WITH. If there wasn't any light, you'd be in total darkness regardless of anything blocking your view.
The clear is seen by all observers to be a constant, we all agree we see the same constant rate of clear. You see object constants through the clear constant.
 
The clear is seen by all observers to be a constant, we all agree we see the same constant rate of clear. You see object constants through the clear constant.
You say clear... do you mean white light? White light is not "clear"...

An energy coupling by the invisble constant
Constant of what? Do you even know what a constant is?

Em radiation exists light is a brain thing

... No... no it isn't. If it were "a brain thing", then machinery wouldn't be able to detect it... and we have plenty of photosensitive equipment that can...
 
No.

No, no, no and no.

Light is a small segment of the EM spectrum. The part that our eyes have evolved to interpret. Insects can see a slightly larger range of the EM spectrum than we can, they can see ultraviolet parts of the EM spectrum, too. But it's all still "light". Which is real.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top