The conference hall debate!

Status
Not open for further replies.
I spent the whole day at my desk doing my calculus course. Tomorrow, I'll work on my physics course.

I can make a blog too attached to the university. A privilege given from the university.
 
theorist-constant12345 said:
What knowledge do you deem there is needed to understand what we observe and what we do not observe?

I will take truths over any text any day. Light is a simple subject .
Click to expand...

There is a vast difference between knowledge and what we observe...

People used to observe the world around them, and came to the conclusion that they could cure headaches by drilling holes in peoples heads to "let out the pressure" and could cure illnesses by "balancing the humors of the body" by draining blood...

Knowledge and science tells us that those conclusions are incredibly faulty (not to mention outright dangerous)
 
theorist-constant12345 said:
I have not agreed that em radiation is not needed, where do i say that?
Click to expand...
I asked you directly. I wrote:

James R said:
By theorist-constant's definition, I can make it go from "dark" to "light" by pushing on my eyelids.

That is, "light" and "dark" actually have nothing to do with electromagnetic radiation under this definition. They are states that only depend on the human brain.

Is that correct?
Click to expand...

And you replied:
theorist-constant12345 said:
Yes that is correct except the energy conversion/activation, in the brain needs the energy of EM radiation of a specific frequency to become activated. Intensity not has important as a specific frequency(s),
Click to expand...
So which is it? Is "light" a brain phenomenon or an electromagnetic one?
 
theorist-constant12345 said:
What knowledge do you deem there is needed to understand what we observe and what we do not observe?

I will take truths over any text any day. Light is a simple subject .
Click to expand...


Your last sentence first, is quite ironic in actual fact. Your idea of truth is greatly distorted by your delusions of grandeur, your lack of proper education in the field, and your childish stubborness.

On the first sentence/paragraph, we observe many things about light....it is real...it is a quantum thingy with a dual nature......it is never at rest and donates the universal speed limit, and is totally constant at that limit.
We observed hundreds of years ago, that white light is composed of seven colours consisting of what we call a rainbow....we observe light to be a part of the EMS, that is conducive to sight.... we observe total dark/blackness to be the absence of EMR .....conversely we observe black to be the absence of colour or light
 
By
Kittamaru said:
There is a vast difference between knowledge and what we observe...

People used to observe the world around them, and came to the conclusion that they could cure headaches by drilling holes in peoples heads to "let out the pressure" and could cure illnesses by "balancing the humors of the body" by draining blood...

Knowledge and science tells us that those conclusions are incredibly faulty (not to mention outright dangerous)
Click to expand...
By observe I also mean the observation of science from learning.
 
James R said:
I asked you directly. I wrote:



And you replied:

So which is it? Is "light" a brain phenomenon or an electromagnetic one?
Click to expand...
Both, a brain phenomenon by use of the em energy, a conversion of energy into an electrical chemical signal.
 
paddoboy said:
Your last sentence first, is quite ironic in actual fact. Your idea of truth is greatly distorted by your delusions of grandeur, your lack of proper education in the field, and your childish stubborness.

On the first sentence/paragraph, we observe many things about light....it is real...it is a quantum thingy with a dual nature......it is never at rest and donates the universal speed limit, and is totally constant at that limit.
We observed hundreds of years ago, that white light is composed of seven colours consisting of what we call a rainbow....we observe light to be a part of the EMS, that is conducive to sight.... we observe total dark/blackness to be the absence of EMR .....conversely we observe black to be the absence of colour or light
Click to expand...
Explain what is this white light you keep insisting on?
 
Science says that snow white is made up of several entangled drawfs that are presently sprinting from my light bulb all around my room past my eyes and into my eyes, bumping into and off objects, science always says that when snow white reaches the prism gate the dwarfs become untangled. Hmmmmmm'
 
theorist-constant12345 said:
Surely you gest about this white light and seven frequencies have you been influenced by snow white and the seven drawfs?
Click to expand...

My sympathy for you is genuine. You have issues that really need attending to.
I'm not going through the experiment that shows white light composed of the colours of the rainbow, you would just reject that anyway as you do all of science.
It's a pity we don't have a doctor on the forum, to diagnose your condition which is so obvious to all.
Like I told you before, when the world tells you that you are wrong, you need to step back and grab a hold of some reality.
The only other option is also a distinct possibility, and as the beer and straw girl inferred. Maybe you are getting your rocks off in all these replies you get?
Or maybe you are deliberatley pressing every non scientific button you can to see how long it will be before you are banned. :shrug:
 
TTE="Daecon, post: 3277760, member: 273534"]White light is every colour of the rainbow all at once.[/QUOTE]
Every spectral colour seen at once is white , this can be demonstrated on a spectral wheel, however I can see the wheel and the white through the clear.
 
theorist-constant12345 said:
Science says that snow white is made up of several entangled drawfs that are presently sprinting from my light bulb all around my room past my eyes and into my eyes, bumping into and off objects, science always says that when snow white reaches the prism gate the dwarfs become untangled. Hmmmmmm'
Click to expand...
Are you attempting to extract the urine?
 
paddoboy said:
My sympathy for you is genuine. You have issues that really need attending to.
I'm not going through the experiment that shows white light composed of the colours of the rainbow, you would just reject that anyway as you do all of science.
It's a pity we don't have a doctor on the forum, to diagnose your condition which is so obvious to all.
Like I told you before, when the world tells you that you are wrong, you need to step back and grab a hold of some reality.
The only other option is also a distinct possibility, and as the beer and straw girl inferred. Maybe you are getting your rocks off in all these replies you get?
Or maybe you are deliberatley pressing every non scientific button you can to see how long it will be before you are banned. :shrug:
Click to expand...
Yes paddy you clearly showed us your countless knowledge , explain this white light you keep mentioning, what is it, how can I see it?
 
White light, um... ah, I know:

WHITE LIGHT IS A COMBINATION OF ALL OF THE VISIBLE WAVELENGTHS OF THE ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM, WHEN SEEN AT THE SAME TIME.

Does bold caps help you understand this very simple thing that's been explained to you more than once?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top