Originally posted by tillich
Another case is that female try to act casually and freely like males in the life, especially in the sexual affairs, which neglect all the criteria of the virtue.
i would just like you to clarify what virtue you meant here? if i read it correctly then women should not be able to be sexually agressive, that they should all be good little children and wait for marriage or true love or some other media influenced bullshit. please correct me if im wrong.
Originally posted by tillich
the characters of male or female, such as tenderness, considerate, aggressive.
i have to argue this. spend ten minuets with me and you will not find a tender or considerate bone in my body. i am by nature a cold-hatefull-bitch. when i find things i want or goals i with to achieve i persue them fully and aggressivly, i dont expect special treatment because im a woman. you stated that men are generally cabable of being physically superior to women (if both are adequately trained) but does this make women somehow less valuable, that we should have to sit at home and sew? i now nothing of domestic arts of any kind. i can t cook, i cant sew, i can keep my damn room clean. but i can tear a computer apart and when its back together it will work better than before. i have a logic based mind and i excell in math and science, why should i (or more to the point any woman) be denied the option to become whatever their individual talents lead them to. (sorry i just had to give the domestic bit) i have one last little comment and ill be done. i have joined the u.s navy. i leave for boot on july 16. im tired of hearing about women in the millitary.
riddle me this: would you rather have women who want to be there serving or men who will run at their first chance? remember you freedoms depend on the success or failure of the millitary to protect them from outside aggression.