I have a new project on this tragedy-comedy with telepathy and Schizophrenia: http://www.facebook.com/home.php?sk=group_202874776390916 .
In your view?Anyway in my view telepathy is a psychic ability to transmit messages from one mind to another and is a natural ability of the human mind(some have strong while others have weak to feel it).
It isn't, and there isn't isn't.It made me believe that telepathy is true and the way the author supports the concept really makes us believe that there is some scientific support also for it.
It isn't, and there isn't isn't.
With who? Anybody? Could you do it with me? Can you read my mind?
Can you move muscles on my body from a distance?
How far apart can you be for your telepathy to work? Is distance a factor?
*************
M*W: I've found that being with the same person for 20 years, we do communicate telepathically. I don't know if it is truly ESP or just a heightened sensitivity to each other. For example, I'll be thinking of something, even if it just comes into my head, and lo and behold, my partner/friend will say it out loud. Now, he's not especially sensitive in other areas, but it's as if he anticipates what I'm thinking. Like I said, we don't have to dwell on the thought for very long. I don't know if he's picking up my thoughts or if I'm picking up his thoughts, but the thoughts are usually generated by me (what I want to do, what I need from the store, what's going on with family, etc.). It always amazes me, though.
Hello, and thanks for you sharing your experiences :
What do think this [ picking up of another persons thoughts are ] due to ?
Could it be that certain peripheral aspects of the minds of both of you, due to extensive togetherness over the years, and exposure, along with familiarity over time has forged together, not only a personal mental union but, a mental sphere of commonality, or collective need, to act in the best interest of members of that commonality, namely you and your spouse. And this ( picking up of thoughts ) is justified mainly in the context of doing things out a need of mutual benefit, and that in turn, effectuates a brain wave entwining of frequency intervention on a sub par zone level to bi communicate mutual thoughts together, which you may or may not, both be aware of, and this chemical interaction,action, can be comparative to the mental art form called discussed here known as [ telepathy }?
Opinions cheerfully expressed, whether in consensus or in disagreement, help understanding and
collaboration with one another!
Sciforums, where the impossible is explained!
.
...But that, when you're being tested by non believers this effects you, ...which distort your concentrative abilities, and hamper, if not destroy the success of the transmissions...
sciforums : where the impossible is explained
Empirical evidence is not possible with measuring devices we have.
If someone had tried to explain wave and particle theory 300 years ago they probably would be laughed at.
So the only methods available for proving telepathy and such is with laws of probabilities. All skeptics can ignore the probabilities because our scientific model is not set up to accept probabilities.
However there are hundreds of quantifiable tests (yes! i will be asked to link them by some idiot) that have shown that probabilities of psychic phenomenon have influenced the results.
Blogs such as these threads carry with them many "trolls". These are people who like to peruse "parapsychology threads" and poke fun where they can.
I fail to understand the glee this must instill in them, but suggest they can have more fun trolling in online games. Why would a skeptic even be in the paranormal sections of sciforums?
However; for some of us who accept the "law of probabilities" and would like to understand the how and why of what we observed, just think the trolls are close-minded idiots. That is another term for skeptic.
James Randi will be remembered for hindering mindkind,...
There are currently more people who believe in the law of probabilities than in science based only upon empirical evidence.
So the skeptics have lost, except for the few die hard losers who troll the paranormal threads.
I am assuming you mean empirical evidence of telepathy. Of course it is. Put a sender in one room, a receiver in another room, and some video cameras in both. It ain't rocket science.
I don't think there was evidence available to model "wave and particle theory" 300 years ago, so it's kind of a silly statement.
I have seen people come up with theories and ideas before. Thumbing your nose at people hiding behind accepted facts does little to impress people who have participated in psychic experiments. Accepting reduced odds is less tempting when you have witnessed the results yourself. It is unfortunate others cannot experience the feeling of knowing that there is a higher self, and we are all connected.Being a paranormal section doesn't detract from the fact that this is a science site. If bold claims that something is true are made then there had better be some bold evidence to back it up.
Not! There is not a hope of convincing any skeptics with this sort of experiment. There was a sleep telepathy experiment used to influence dreams. It was the double blind - lab coats - locked doors type of study.
They had "hits" that defied 75000:1 odds.
Now Seriously! Does that change your mind? You would rather look at the simple experiment you described as either a) flawed or b) that the 1 chance it was fluke is the fact. I was not thinking of ganzfield experiments, and am unsure as to what they are. I can see where a few groups of skeptics in 2 rooms with video cameras would fail to send messages through the walls. I would think that in the first instance the people would participate in the experiment as should be expected, and the same experiment repeated with fellows like yourself might make for a decent card game instead.
So yes! I do not see how "laws of probabilities" will affect skeptics. I did say however that most people agree with the "laws of probabilities so the skeptics have lost. Yes that means you. I just think of you as a troll here, and thought i'd take the time to tell you.
Now wasn't that the point i was trying to make. Are you arguing for me?
I would argue that if someone started a thread about wave and particle theory 300 years ago it would have to be in the paranormal section. It would also receive its share of skeptics browsing by and making idiotic comments.
Then young comes along with the double slit experiment and poof! Everyone is happy to be on board with it.
I have seen people come up with theories and ideas before. Thumbing your nose at people hiding behind accepted facts does little to impress people who have participated in psychic experiments.
Accepting reduced odds is less tempting when you have witnessed the results yourself. It is unfortunate others cannot experience the feeling of knowing that there is a higher self, and we are all connected.
So yes! I feel sorry for them/you.
I do not agree with all the claims in many of the threads, but I can avoid piping in negativity just for negativities sake. I think that sort of behaviour is more suited to children (and obviously yourself).
Those are symbolic representations of observable and repeatable outcomes.