Taliban flee battle using children as shields: NATO

Status
Not open for further replies.
My dear Buffalo,

i hope all is well with you.

The last part of this paragraph is outrageous, wher on earth can you justify this. Just becuase a few knobs backed by the House of Saud, have the twisted whabbist ideology and happen to call themelves muslims mean that it is the fault of all muslims and Islam as a religion. What we are seeing now is a point in time.

A few days ago somone one suggested that some reserach be done into which religion in name has killed the most people over the last few years, i however told him to perhaps go back further 9or aks the question why) unfortunately he did not respond. i dont think you Bufallo would want to put a wager that islam over the last 1000 years or so has killed the most people do you?????



Oh and by the way the fucked up taleban are absolute dickhead muthafuckers ...... well you know my opinion on them anyway so i wont go further on this.

please may i ask that you retract some of the above statement, as you are falling into the trap of the Saudi backed whabbists,.. Dont do it buffalo dont fall into their trapm, this is what they want you to think...


~~~~~~~~~~~

take it ez

Zakariya04, I can justify this by the fact samcdkey and most like her have never totally denounced the acts of Moslem terrorist, who are using direct quotes from Mohammad to justify their actions, they quote the Quran word perfect and then go on their mission with the blessings of the prophet, what am I to feel, samcdkey and her like excuse every action, and the connection that is apparent is that she is Moslem and they are Moslem, all I seem to see from Moslems is excusing of the terrorist because they are believers of the same religion, and who do they all spring from? The word of Mohammad? Zakariaya its time for the Moslems to denounce these people in no uncertain terms, not only are they killing Christians, Hindu, Animist, but also your fellow Moslems, and what does sam do always point to some other to blame, it time to look at the actions of your own religion, what in the religion of Islam causes people in the 21 century to believe that it is ok to kill people over cultural differences, or the fact that you may live in a poor country, or that your come from a poor back ground, it seem the answer from Mohammad is to go out and take it from the infidels as in his opinion they are not the chosen people, so take all your problem out on the Infidel the Jews and other people you don't like, You are my friend but I'm tired of hearing people defend the atrocities of terrorism committed by terrorist by using moral relativism, what the Moslem terrorist have and are doing is not defensible, to kill in a stand up fight is one thing, but to mutilate, and turn the creation of God, into a quivering mass of screaming pain, and then to hack the head off of a human in a way worse than the butchering of a animal, that has to bring up the question of the beliefs of these people, and the prophet they follow.

Dear Buffalo,

thank you for your response to my post.

i have to say i am disappointed by it though, as you seem to have fallen into the trap of Bin Lid and his bunch of Saudi backed whabbist imberciles.

I really dont understand why you say us muslims dont condem these people, i know sam and ghost do, and i do too..

did you read my thread as below

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=62704


this is just one of the many posts i have made deoncuncing these arseholes..

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Take care
zak


hey buffalo,

i was wodnerign whether you've had the chance to look at my response.

i will be most appreciatvive to hear your comments

~~~~~~~~~~
thanks
 
I really believe that if seem up close you would find that they weren't really wedding parties, and that Terrorist were having a sit-down to make plans to attack more innocent civilians.
So these guys were targets? Why did the Pentagon apologise? You dont seem to realise that killing civillians does nothing to help your "war on terror". Dissmissing them as "oh they were probably terrorists" does you great harm.
 
So these guys were targets? Why did the Pentagon apologise? You dont seem to realise that killing civillians does nothing to help your "war on terror". Dissmissing them as "oh they were probably terrorists" does you great harm.

All the precision guided weaponry is useless when brainless twits are operating them.

In April four Canadian soldiers died when a US fighter bombed them by mistake during a training exercise.
 
Nickelodeon and not hitting viable target when the opportunity does you great harm to, and I don't recall the Pentagon apologizing for taking out the terrorist, and there is no way that many weddings could be mistakenly targeted, it seems that a week doesn't go by that were aren't accused of bombing a wedding party. Can you prove that these wedding party's were wedding parties, and that they weren't meetings of terrorist.
 
Nickelodeon and not hitting viable target when the opportunity does you great harm to, and I don't recall the Pentagon apologizing for taking out the terrorist, and there is no way that many weddings could be mistakenly targeted, it seems that a week doesn't go by that were aren't accused of bombing a wedding party. Can you prove that these wedding party's were wedding parties, and that they weren't meetings of terrorist.
Did you read the fucking link?
 
Nickelodeon and not hitting viable target when the opportunity does you great harm to, and I don't recall the Pentagon apologizing for taking out the terrorist, and there is no way that many weddings could be mistakenly targeted, it seems that a week doesn't go by that were aren't accused of bombing a wedding party. Can you prove that these wedding party's were wedding parties, and that they weren't meetings of terrorist.

This from the people who are in the middle of a war over a few tins of baking soda.:rolleyes:
 
Nickelodeon

So these guys were targets? Why did the Pentagon apologise? You dont seem to realise that killing civillians does nothing to help your "war on terror". Dissmissing them as "oh they were probably terrorists" does you great harm.
Survivors of the attack said several guests had just fired their Kalashnikovs into the air, as is traditional in Pashtun wedding ceremonies. A US air patrol over-head wrongly concluded it was coming under fire and responded with devastating force.

A bad thing to do in a war zone, shoot into the air, with aircraft present. Can you provide independent proof that the terrorist who are known for infiltrating peaceful areas of civilian, and attacking coalition forces weren't there, and precipitated the attack?
 
A bad thing to do in a war zone, shoot into the air, with aircraft present. Can you provide independent proof that the terrorist who are known for infiltrating peaceful areas of civilian, and attacking coalition forces weren't there, and precipitated the attack?


How lovely that you can blame your own atrocities on the enemy!
 
Can you provide independent proof that the terrorist who are known for infiltrating peaceful areas of civilian, and attacking coalition forces weren't there, and precipitated the attack?
Prove a negative? Can you prove, for sure, that there are not 4,000 terrorists in Dallas right now preparing an attack? Oh then it must be true!
 
How lovely that you can blame your own atrocities on the enemy!

Proof that the troops are intellectually challenged and trigger happy
Pentagon officials last night conceded that at least one bomb dropped on the village of Kakarak was "errant". But their initial response was confused and they were unable to explain why the pilots had failed to establish whom they were attacking in a region clearly abandoned by Taliban and al-Qaida fighters several months ago.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top